http://www.wiredbrain.net/ COURSE OUTLINE 1. FEELINGS - THE NATURE OF BEING HUMAN SOCIAL SCIENCE - AND SOCIOLOGY CHAPTER 1 After the first week each group will report about last weeks activities. Each week (Tuesday) there will be a presentation on the next set of activities and chapter reading. The students need to read and discuss the chapter(s) in their groups then assign someone to write up a summary of the discussion and its connec tion to the activity. This is the first week. The purpose of social science is to think systematically about human behavior. Physical sciences have accumulated "knowl edge" of the "laws of nature." Because of magnified thinking, science and technology has changed human life in basic ways over the last few centuries. Science makes a distinction between opinion and facts. Facts are parts of knowledge that can be believed beyond a reasonable doubt. Facts exist independently of the attitude of the person, their culture and interests. The practical applications of knowing more and having greater skills is not a matter for debate. If the student as a person and as member of a society is better informed and better organized than other persons or groups they will be more sucessful. The smart and coordinated will gain more points than the stupid and poorly organized. Compare Haiti and Switzerland or Florida and Massachu setts or Volusia County and Seminole County, to see the effects of different levels of wealth, education, skill, political institutions, and general sophistication. We must make these distinctions or everything becomes a meaningless blur. Of course, some people will not like the comparisons. In evolution and "creationism" the idea of scientific facts is tested against strongly held religious beliefs. The facts of geology, astronomy, evolutionary biology and even genics "prove" that the universe is about fifteen billion years old and life is several billion. History is carried in our genes. We all agree the earth spins around the sun, energy and matter are neither created nor destroyed, to every action there is and equal and opposite reaction, E=mc2 and we believe in other "laws of na ture." These are "theories" that explain phenomena until there is a "better" theory. The clockwork image of the Newtonian theory has been replaced by a "probability" quanta theory because of new observations in physics. The courts rule that "creationism" is not a scientific theory but a religious belief. Our laws have an administrative belief in the institutions of science, journals, books, associations, qualifications, leading to objective truth. This belief in reason, practical facts, and applied theory is the basis of modern culture. They do not have a modern civilization in Haiti because of the believe in magic, voodoo, raw power and feeling over reason. The poorest popula tion in the new world are uneducated. There are objective realities and material consequences from behavior and beliefs. All cultures and beliefs are not equal. If one idea or habit is not better that another then nothing is of value - there are no standards for judgment. Without standards the culture cannot function well and produce wealth, power and success for the individuals within that culture. We all hang together or we all hang separately. The first issue for discussion is the nature of "knowledge" and the role of science in the understanding of human relations. Question two is about the nature of human interactions. Can there be a scientific study of man and society? If so what "laws" have been discovered? Is there a natural law in human affairs? The golden rule reflects the need for people to treat each other in ways they want to be treated. We do not want to be robbed, beaten, unjustly imprisoned, cheated, or lied to. Therefore we need to obey the law and keep the peace. Ethics requires we do more than we have to and less than we can get away with. When we do the right thing we may pay a price. We can gain by feeling better or lose by feeling foolish. Since there are usually several alternatives we can pick the ones that are most likely to be ethical and practical. CONNECTION TO EXERCISE: The beginning of understanding starts with ourselves and our "group." We learn to listen to each other and find out what is important to us as people. What do we know about ourselves? "Who am I?" We learn by interaction with others and seeing how we are the same and different. The beginning of awareness of the "world" is by opening windows into ourselves and others. It has been called conscienceness raising. A primary goal of social science education is to become more aware of the connections between what we are and the larger social and global context. Discuss these ideas in your group. Write up a short statement of what you believe. (Agreement and disagreement) Then the groups pick someone to make a report to the class. Find the connection to the empathetic recall exercise. What is the mission for your life ? 2. WEEK TWO - PERSONALITY SOCIAL Science depends on a theory of psychology. Psychology and the social sciences are not two separate subjects but just ways of looking at the same issues. TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS or SOCIAL RELATIONS is the study of people within systems. People are not fully "human" except for social systems and groups and societies are only collections of people. The "ME" is the interpersonal self and the "I" is the personality held out to the world. Psychology is based on the working of the brain. The under standing of nerves and biochemistry of mind-brain functions can give a solid foundation to understanding how people function. The right and left brain (for right-handed people) is a physical characteristic where the linear language center is located in the left part of the brain and the visual holistic centers are in the right brain. The YIN and YANG of personalities are the balances between the ordered step-by-step left brain compared to the pattern seeking and generalizing right brain. The Myers-Briggs method is based on a psychology developed by Jung. The four dimensions of the test which are; introvert/extrovert, intu ition/sensing, feeling/thinking, and perceiving/judging fit into the two dimensions of the yin/yang right/left brain types. People tend to be practical (extrovert, sensing, thinking and judging) or spiritual, (introvert, intuitive, feeling, and preceiving) male or female, structured or weblike. One type is extroverted, sensing, thinking, judging (practical - concrete sequen tial/experience) the other is introverted, intuitive, feeling, abstract and reflective. Social groups reinforce certain characteristics and suppress others. Learning and behavioral "styles" depend on biology (temperament) and social conditioning. The "ME" depends on the nerves and chemicals in the brain, the "I" is the result of family and social life. The two may match or conflict. The individual seeks pleasure and avoids pain. Social systems "function" as pathway of individual behavior - accepted or repressed. These pathways can be open, partly open, closed or completely closed. Evolution, cooperation and competition, set the biological framework for the species. Human appear to have evolved from packs. The "pack" or tribe has both cooperation and competition in gaining protection from predators and other packs. They cooperate in the long process of raising children. (Compare the movies "Arrowhead" of Ayn Ryan MGM? and "Our Daily Bread" or "The Salt of the Earth" from Warner Brothers)The big brain of people requires and large head. Babies have to be born small enough to get out. Human infants are especially helpless for a long time and need the protection and support of the group. Men are only 20% bigger than women. This suggests that stable pairs rather than dominate male mating patterns were common. In animals where one male dominates the herd the males get very large because only the toughest male gets to breed. The function of social groups is to survive and reproduce. The development of language, technology, social habits help one society grow and expand, while other societies decline and disappear. Vast majorities of "tribal" societies have not survived and have been overrun by more successful groups. The expansion of the "White, Western" civilization in the last few centuries was based on advanced military technology (growth of modern science) and governmental and private systems of finance, insurance, taxation, and other forms of social organization. Honda and General Motors compete. One form of social organization is superior to the other. There are winners and losers of market-share. So it is with cultures and empires. The western capitalist system also is a form of "character" or personality. The attributes of adventure, change, enterprise, is summed up in "Achievement Motivation." Expanded roles of individuals is seen through builders and conquerors of new worlds. Money, wealth, possessions are seen as the symbols of success. The stress on individualism lets us forget that capitalism was and is a social event. Democracy (western style), capitalize (western style), Protestant religion, and science and technology are part of a "seamless web" of social interactions. Our superior civilization is now under attack by other cultures with other advantages. History does not stop but keeps the pressure on. Success leds to "arrogance" and the sin of pride (hubris) is man's downfall. TIME WILL TELL! The Egyptian culture lasted several thousand years but is gone. Ancient civilizations have left us some traditions and customs. The Classic Greek civilization along with the Roman mixed with the Christian culture to lay the foundations of Western Civilization. China has five thousand years of civilization, 20% of the globe's population and a tradition of balance, which maybe renewed in the next century. Japan has a thousand-year old history of independence and the same Imperial family. Russia has had a hard time for a long time. America is an upstart. Vast natural resources gave it a temporary advantage. Its culture is multi-cultural and fractured. Its political institutions have survived for 200 years, through one great civil war, and the great depression. Europe has fought as various powers have tried to control the others - Spain and the Hasburgs, France, England and Germany. The European Community is the dominate economic force in the world. The USA is the last superpower. NATO has more than 50% of the world wealth and if a new north Atlantic alliance survives will be successful in the 21st century. We live in a changing world culture where education and technology dominate the future. The successes of individuals and groups depend on a winning team. The race goes to the swift the only change is the speed of change itself. So what works? Functional analysis leds to objective criteria for success. Evil is dysfunctional. Good is successful. Hitler and communism failed, they were not valid systems. This is not true for socialism as a whole or capitalism as a whole. The Japanese and European forms of collective capitalism maybe functionally superior to individual free enterprise promoted in the USA. Because we are Americans, we may like certain styles as a matter of taste. The "gun ho" collective style may offend us. If we have to compete with the aggressive unified style of Honda then G.M. must become more like them, as they have at Saturn. The Germans have a functional apprenticeship system. They spend $25,000 a year for up to seven years ($175,000) training youth in academic and practical skill for industry. They really know their stuff in machine tools, printing, looms, scientific instruments, chemicals, etc. Both countries think long-term and have ownership and finance patterns that promote long-term planning. France has elite management schools including the "Les X" administrators in government. The "plan" has promoted steady growth despite political instability. Italy has many small specialized firms that have world-wide markets, (clothing and shoes, gold chain, construction, business services and equipment ). Within a global economy we must specialize and push every advantage we can. CONNECTIONS TO EXERCISE: What is your personality type? Are you "here-and-now" or :out-in-space?" How much do you plan your activities and time? Do you go step by step or just jump in and see what happens? Is your group the same or different? How do you begin to understand others ? SOCIOLOGY: (Mexico) Use the functionalist approach and discuss what are the advantages and disadvantages of different personal ity types? What careers (page 78) are better for what types? The Global economy makes new demands for success. Higher level skills (thinking, pattern seeking, innovation, cooperation, math and science, etc. ) will be needed for high incomes in the future. Low level jobs go "elsewhere". What is your plan? SOCIAL SCIENCE: Discuss human evolution. Is personality a product of survival - some personalities do better - breed more and are more common in the next generation? Is aggression more useful than cooperation? What other social process is the result of biology? (p 36 in the Textbook -Perry and Perry -7th edition) 3. WEEK 3 - CREATIVITY SOCIAL SCIENCE - Chapter 3 Groups SOCIOLOGY - Chapter 3 Japan - Information Theory Humans become human by training. People learn their role and "how to behave" from the social system - families, schools, churches and other institutions. This is tradition, folkways, customs, morals, totem and taboo. Gemeinshafts are small village and clan systems where people are individuals within a semi- closed society. Gesellschafts are complex modern societies which become impersonal. People become roles and function, rules are semi-rational and technical, and there is more competition, exchange and conflict. Information processing - setting goals and objectives (sub- goals) - knowing where to find information; ordering the vast amounts of data (good, poor, and terrible) into a useful system, looking for alternatives, and making choices based on facts and reasoned risks is the critical survival skills of today and tomorrow. We start with creativity because first we have to look out side the ruts we are all in. Social systems and traditions are both guides and ruts. If you are lost its sometimes a good idea to follow in the ruts of others and hope they know where they are going - but sometimes its a good idea to look up and set your own goals based on your own vision. First we need to pay attention. Open our eyes! What is going on here? What do we do when we don't know what to do? RE: How do we know what we are talking about? To try to make the structure of knowledge more that a matter of opinion is more or less impossible. BUT there is the ancient wisdom But my opinion is better than most. Why? Because it makes sense. Because it reflect objective reality. A good theory explains a lot. Makes what appeared separate - operate on the same principles. My theory explains education. business, social problems, politics, psychology, economics, philosophy, human relationships, and how to behave - it may give us the answers on who to manage the planet so we don't destroy our grandchildren - I think that matters. It also is old - nothing new - it's as old as civilization. Most cultures that survive believe the same thing - it's in the bible - the Koran - Plato - Aristotle - St. Augustine - The Sufi way - Zen - Biha'i - the Society of Friends - the Seneca - the Hopi - The Aborigines - The freemasons - The church and the Declaration of independence - some simple clear principles - don't you see - What are they ? (I have a longer paper - on request) No free lunch. (It takes work) Entropy increases. (It take goals, missions) Pay attention to one thing at a time (clear the mind, focus, grounded, centered healthy mind and a fit body-) Synergy is the unique human capacity - (it's social, work together - man alone is not much but in groups WOW) You are already perfect - don't be so critical of yourself or other. (Rodney - Come on people - can't we just get along?) Get on with it - only God is certain - To seek certainty or to believe you are certain is ideology - hubris - We can only do the best we can by the light we have in us - and by seeking - being and becoming - if we try. (We are only human) Maybe this is too simple - KISS - keep it simple - we are not as smart as we think we are - we can only keep five things in our head at one time. It's profound not complex. First its a convention of language caries the cultural paradigm with it. If I talk to a Greek or a New Ghanian he understand within a different context than we do. A Russian carries more Greek thought about freedom, liberty, etc. than we do. They don't think you are "free to sleep under bridges" or are free if you are subject to false beliefs and ideas. Freedom is difficult to gain. One has to transcend the local frame of thought (the cultural paradigm). Language entraps us. Second - if we say a is like b, and c. A=b ( plus an unexplained residual plus error) part of the unexplained part is in c so a=b (R & E) + c (R & E) and so forth A= E (summation sign) (x's + R +E) n times where x 's are all the elements we use to define or explain A. The errors build up. Some of the residual is error, bias, statistical auroras (we like what we like, and like what we know we should like, and we like what people we like, and visa versa) etc. If you explain school performance is 80% explained by the education of the parents, the next factor is income of parents, there is no unexplained residual for schools, teacher salaries, books, etc. This does not mean these factors don't matter. (You really need to use rank order systems - because there are not all real numbers - IQ and other normalized test scores (SAT) are not a real numbers two people with 80 don't add to 160 but the results are the same) Therefore, social rather than physical issues contain too much error to give more that a "preponderance of evidence" rather than "beyond a moral doubt". Social and psychological problems are a civil rather than a criminal case. They have to be understood with "everything" we know. Not quite common sense but logical conclusions. Better off students live in better off communities that spend more money on their schools. Poor kids live in poor communities which spend less, where teachers don't want to teach, and conditions tend to be bad. Rich kids aren't better kids (generically or otherwise) the system has a bias toward the rich and powerful and against the poor and powerless. The really interesting case is HEROS - Higher math in East LA, District # 4 in East Harlem - where someone is fighting the odds - see it can be done. It take power and character. Surprise? Why don't we do what we know. Why are systems so stupid? They going on doing what they know (or should know doesn't work - small units of time (credits) - broken up subjects - big schools etc see my smart schools or see Fiske book - or Goodlad, Glickman's article, The Emperor has no cloths - look open your eyes ) It's communism! American Education is to learning what communism is to economics. (Bennett, Bill Devaluing America) stuck - it need a real restructuring! This is the middle level of knowledge and we have a high level of uncertainly. Therefore we have politics. If we knew the right answers we could hire experts and they would fix it. The experts have a poor record in fixing social issues. What have experts done with education? Why have they done so badly? Are they stupid, evil - no the system defeats them. (some are - self-interest - pride - hubris - over certain schools of education teaching what they don't know and can't do, superintendents shouldn't try to run things - have ideas but create conditions where things can happen) So they have to fix the system - right! If your so smart. why aren't you rich? My belief is that the people doing stuff should be allowed to do it. To become a learning community. Second is competition. The free market works better that communism - state capitalism - become bureaucratic and incapable of ration behavior. When we get to the third level. What is the purpose of schools. Who's aims do they serve? What about teaching character - morals etc. We leave the real world. Different groups are using term differently and we often don't know what they are talking about. For some Christians, truth is absolute and right there and they know it. For some liberals "do your own thing" is a moral position. Grades are a limitation on human freedom. It becomes the tower of babble. SO my idea is what works? Schools need a moral value to work. They can't be all things to all people. So again the market. Little schools for true believers in military ardor - black power - Fundamentalist Christian (as long a public funds don't go to the teaching of there beliefs as part of the state supported program - like in Higher education money goes to support the students and Notre Dame and Liberty University, Bob Jones not the theory) R0E: Unskilled labor Why do we pretend to know what we know? We face the facts of unskilled and unmotivated labor everyday in our classrooms. Kids are passed on regardless. The lock step factor system doesn't work and it just gets worse. Now we blame the students by calling them names - if they fail to learn they are learning disabled, if they misbehave they are emotionally disturbed, if they don't pay attention and don't do their work they have Attention Defect disorder. There used to be less that 2% really handicapped children. Now there are 10% or more. Dyslexia is a rare problem but because Johnny can't read he has dyslexia. What is the fault of the students and teachers and what are system problems. Most are system problems (80% or more) but we blame the parents, the teachers, the students, the politicians, the far right, etc. Fix the problem not the blame. The cure is simple and easy. SMALL SCHOOL ungraded and stable. VOTE FOR HORACE school board District #3 It is not your job to come up with new ideas. There are plenty of great ideas but they almost all get all messed up in the implementation. First, you have to fix the system so anything can work. There is Goals2000, a good idea gone strange - outcome based education, writing to read, house system, middle schools, year round schools, assessment, testing, special education, Heterogeneous Grouping and curriculum design (SEE Effective School Practices, ADI, Eugene OR, winter 93) and on and on. Your job on the school board is to help create conditions where teacher can do their job. Freedom for professionals. Small schools ( a building is not a school) allows empowerment - then they can figure it out for themselves. (askERIC) From the boring factory (x=grey) to the consultation, involvement, participation of human relations (y=pink) to the fired up - turned on - excited (Z=red) groups. That is what I do in my classes. About 1/3 get really turned on and take charge. About another 1/3 do fine. The last 1/3 don't get harmed in anyway and may benefit in the long run, they didn't try and if you don't try there is little I can do. Now in a small school with a stable population I would get 100% but the unit credit system makes teaching almost impossible. I only have a fraction of a person a fraction of the time. (They do need to do their algebra) This summer it's better, almost all are involved maybe 75%. My job as a teacher (guide) is to create an environment where this can happen. It's fun. Joy is the clue. They are there early and leave late. They are active and animated. It is a wonder to see - all those grey faces in rows (up to 40 in the first day of a class) become a turned on bunch of people all doing their own thing (within the setup, sort of). I let go of command and make a joyful noise. The point system means I don't grade. I have expectation and the work in most cases is clearly better and lasts longer than the traditional system. (The man under the tree with a textbook who talks and gives tests) See also Ted's Horace. (Sizer) I am glad you are reading Smart Schools - See also Grant Wiggins on Assessment (KAPPAN Nov 93) RE: MAN AS THE MEASURE OF ALL THINGS: Now that's silly. The fault is pride, hubris. The issue is not science and technology - but the false idea that we can do without higher missions. We as a society need missions, an ideology, a belief system. There is no real dispute between science and religion. How we see the face of God is a process, and can be done in a logical and rational, or in a spiritual or mystic way or both. Just don't think we are God. God knows but I don't. This may be looked at as a "strange" answer but it works for me. 2 Cor 12:1 Now this is our boast: Our conscience testifies that we have conducted ourselves in the world, and especially in our relations with you, in the holiness and sincerity that are from God. We have done so not according to worldly wisdom but according to God's grace. (NIV) I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know-- God knows. And I know that this man-- whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, but God knows-- And I know that this man-- whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, but God knows-- I will boast about a man like that, but I will not boast about myself, except about my weaknesses. Even if I should choose to boast, I would not be a fool, because I would be speaking the truth. But I refrain, so no one will think more of me than is warranted by what I do or say. To keep me from becoming conceited because of these surpassingly great revelations, there was given me a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me. Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me. But he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me. I have made a fool of myself, but you drove me to it. I ought to have been commended by you, for I am not in the least inferior to the "super-apostles," even though I am nothing. 2 Cor 12:20 For I am afraid that when I come I may not find you as I want you to be, and you may not find me as you want me to be. I fear that there may be quarreling, jealousy, outbursts of anger, factions, slander, gossip, arrogance and disorder. (NIV) RE: Capitalism (American Style) and the City on the Hill The reason organized labor made much higher wages than other workers was do to constraints on the free market. From electricians who limited apprentice, and unions that got laws passed requiring Union workers and memberships in closed clubs. (In Chicago the Plasters slowed down the use of wall boards for a generation). Auto and Steel workers collaborated with the price fixing of the big corporations (U.S. Steel, General Motors, General Electric could manage prices ) because high profits meant high wages. A really free market pushes prices down and causes all kinds of trouble. (Look at the Airline industry when it had real competition - free entry of new low cost Airlines - no one made any real money and wages were pushed down ). The government was used to protect these combines rather than break them up. In Tucker "The man and his dream" you see big business and government conspire to shut out the new innovative enterprise. There was no mention of the UAW which I am sure helped. (Owners don't have that many vote - they do have money) The City on the Hill speech, Ronald Reagan gave many times when we worked for GE's PR department in the early 60's. He then gave the full text for Goldwater at the 1963 convention. It was the core of his 1980 campaign. (The speech) The City on the Hill comes from Governor Bradford's history of the Mayflower Compact and the pilgrims of the Bay Colony. The history shows that "Puritan" were a better, more virtuous people. They had left the bad ways of the old world to found a society the would be pure in the new world. The colony would be as a "City on the Hill" an example to mankind of right living. The message is fundamentalist (Calvinist) Christian and capitalist in principles. Reagan also kept quoting from an false summary of Lincoln's pro business principles. His favorite was that trying to help others (the poor) just made them worse off, another that someone being rich didn't make other poorer but that individualism created wealth, Government just took it away to support bureaucrats. The speech says the country was build by these pioneers and their values. Hard work, rectitude, independence, self management, private property, private wealth et al are America. Now the Liberal elite (University people, media type, and rabble rousers, bureaucrats and their establishment supporters) where out to destroy our way of life by undermining the principles which made us great. (The central theme of the John Birch society is that groups like- The Council on Foreign Relations, the Eastern establishment are anti-American) The neo-conservative led by Irving Kristol, William Buckley, George Will and sometimes by Daniel Patrick Moynihan (a fellow traveler) showed the flaws in tradition new-deal policies. These policies often made things worse for the people they were meant to help. The highway program, public housing, welfare, are prisons for the poor and infringes on their independence. The programs only added to the power of bureaucrats and congressmen and created a lot of middle class jobs for Democrats. The "social workers" supported the Democratic machines and the one party lock on Government. The "new-deal" programs bought vote from minorities with public funds. The war on poverty was nothing more that a system of ward healing by democratic operatives in poor communities. All of this is not too far from true. William Bennett's new book "The De-Valuing America" is part political rightness but also a clear and correct statement of what is going on - In Chicago Public Schools - for example. Read the book before you pick on it. Liberals got their moral in a tangle. Democratic conventions with dozens of special interest groups (women, gays, socialist, environmentalist, etc) feed the picture of a bunch of "wild" people who were not the "silent majority" of heartland America. This is the Cultural War (a poor phase because it was used by Hitler to attach Catholics among others Kultura Krig) Are liberals amoral? Do socialist have no sense of values? Of course not. Are Republicans and the Religious Right better people? Of course not. It's politics but there is a real issue - The planet is suffering from a moral crisis. The old authority structures no longer work. (Tony Wallace - The Death and rebirth of the Seneca) There are ghost cults. There are doomsday tribes. There are false profits. This is what happens when cultures change due to outside pressure. (Rome, the 18th Century, and today) We new a new world order - a tall order - and a lot of Vision. Sixty type radicals only help the other side. Free livers and free lovers are meat to the butcher. Christian liberals like those that have gain control of the British Labor party need to have their morals clear and clean. The left has no hope unless it reassures the insincere middle that they are puritans - another tall order. Norman Thomas (do you have to ask who he was? The Socialist leader for many years - got 3 million votes in 1932), like President W. Wilson was a good moral man, I had the honor to know - James Balwin - of the American Civil Liberties Union - there is no finer American - where are they now ? They also need a program of Jewish Christian Western competitive capitalism (When I say Christian I mean liberal Christian values, WCC types) - that is more than Greed - Worker cooperation, social responsibility, global ethics, and all the rest. (Al Gore may do, or another Southern Baptist like Carter)