SYNERGY-NET on http://www.wiredbrain.net/ RE: How bureaucracy finally strangles its own ability to survive! It is an old family story that Grandfather Edwardo put himself to sleep for several decades reading Gibbon's "Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire." One essentials point is made in that great story: "the Empire fell of it's own weight". It was not overwhelmed by external enemies but simply had become paralyzed by its own bureaucracy. The social law of bureaucratic cancer put an end to the Roman Empire after 25 generations, the Spanish Empire after 5, the British Empire about the same, Soviet Empire in three generation, to IBM and GM in two, and MICROSOFT in one. What brings this topic on, is looking at my institutions phone book and realizing 80% of the names and positions have little or nothing to do with the mission of the organization but could be called support, such as a communications or women's center, but they provide no day care that would support the clients, they have administrative enterprises of all kinds that don't return a unit of measured work or in private terms " PROFIT." Less than half of the institutions resources go to serving the institutions mission. I am not sure people realize this. You need administration, staff services, buildings and grounds etc but enough is too much. They have become so large that the central role of the institution is almost forgotten and becomes secondary to the administration of itself, just like under communism in the USS was. This is an organic and natural process, of bureaucries feeding on themselves, and can only be stopped or reversed by great external pressures. There are more people in the Department of Agriculture, the Agricultural extension services and land grant colleges than farmers. In most large school systems, colleges and universities there are more non-teaching staff (often hidden with teacher sounding titles, than classroom instructors). There are twice as many clerical than sickness treatment people in the modern hospital, including Floor people who do only paperwork , insurance and such like. Is a serious problem. All these people are busy but unnecessary. The fact that they are working hard blinds them to the fact that what they "do" doesn't need to be done. It is only required by themselves and their own system. When the administrative overhead becomes more than half of the total operating cost, it clearly represents a problem. The rebellion of the right led by Newt feels the federal state is strangling the enterprise that makes social life possible. All Bureaucracies in quasi-monopolies, in communist states, in public schools (where less than 50% of resources get to the classroom) , in any big organization's administrative systems, are clearly a necessary evil that can become so large and expensive it overwhelm the ability of the organization to produce and survive. The value of capitalism is that sometimes there is real competition. Real competition forces the reduction in administrators vs." Doers" or downsizing - becoming lean and mean. The Airlines reduced overhead by more than 50% from the fixed price era to survival under competitive conditions, ( not PAA and Eastern, etc.. who are no longer with us) AT&T likewise has been drastically cutting overhead, planes still fly, calls still work, what were all those people doing? Having meetings and passing paper among themselves and creating more paperwork and more administrative positions - this is why deregulation is so important. The Japanese culture promotes decentralization. Decisions are pushed down as far as possible. Western cultures promote centralization. Decisions are pushed up as far as possible. The Western character looks for "heros", who take charge, who are leaders, the cowboy John Wayne enterprise. The oriental civilizations are collective, the desire is to blend in, not stick out. The work groups, the project teams, the "skunk works" are the source of creativeness, synergy, and power not administrative systems. Promotion by seniority has lowered the pressure to create more high level jobs so people can get raises. Flatter pay scales reduce the pressure to have so many captains, majors, col., and generals. This is the real social change going on and sooner or later will get to public bureaucries, schools, banks, police departments. Etc. if they are to survive rather than be replaced or fall of their own weight. ************************************************ RE: How SYNERGY creates the THIRD WAVE: New Educational, Governmental, organizational models. (Why the MASLOW - Benedict thesis is critical to understanding our times and the future.) The Thesis: The Third Wave is defined as Independent rewards from voluntary cooperation within open communications systems. Less bureaucracy, less government, less big corporations, less socialist and industrial capitalist, less conservative, less liberal, more flexible, quick, creative, flowing, moral, value driven, domestic global village, independent, libertarian, and religious. The open structure of the INTERNET encourages new centers of creative energy outside institutional limits and reward systems. SYNERGY= shared rewards derived from cooperation and mutual aid. Motivation for effort are the material and non-material symbols of independently achieved quality. THE TROOP: We are genetically programmed to communicate in small groups. Human Language uses symbols that create and reinforce mutual aid and sharing. The troop on the savanna need to work together to survive, raise children and defend themselves. Linguistic symbols formed the "DREAMTIME" of laws, customs, traditions, and social manners and habits that defined a "people". The TRIBE: The first wave were agricultural settlements that required planning, patience, institutional structures, (religion, clans, government, economics) and means of conflict resolution. In the Death and Rebirth of the Seneca, Wallace describes the long house and the free association of groups to create "world peace". Sharing naturally creates synergy, intergroup arrangements (federation of the six nations) can bring lasting peace, through ceremony, discussion, leadership, character and vision. SECOND WAVE - The industrial revolution, with the systemic application of science (rational thought) and technology (, always looking for a better way) made nations possible. Large scale warfare and exploration required big formal institution; Corporations, insurance, Armies, Navies, Courts and tax collectors. The factory system gained from economies of scale and scientific management. Corporations, State Enterprise, all took on the same bureaucratic rationalism describe by Max Weber, people became positions and roles. The American Experiment in rational government was matched by the Communist exploration in state capitalism. Everything could be rationally planned and organized by leaders and owners. The THIRD WAVE, began with the revolt against BIG, Institutional, Bureaucrat power in the 1960's. The utopian schemes of liberal capitalism or bureaucratic communism came under fire from Small is Beautiful, Less is more, libertarian and other ideas and passions. Institutional rewards means institutional behavior and the "man in the gray flannel suit" complex. (IBM white shirts) Which seemed just stupid to many. MBO is management by objectives. Teams gain certain flexibility within set limits and by a prearranged external criteria. TQM (total quality management) means self regulating groups who figure out (using certain tools) what is a systems issue and what is an operational problem. Most problems are system issues, the MBO groups had no power to change and the TQM group does. If the structure is the problem, how can management reinvent itself ? Handy little Book "The Age of Unreason" give insight into the decentralized power field theory. The basic characteristics, and type of organization is very different in third wave (Z - organizations). Z is from Japan, self managing groups they learning partly from Druker (MBO) and Deming (TQM) but and a BIG but - with American individual enterprise and initiative within a free formed collective - i.e. professional collaboration model long suggested by management theory of high tech organizations, (Branch, group theory people et al) with the technological capacity to be spread around the world. This is the model for the INTERNET. No one owns it and no institution can give or withhold rewards. Sun Microsystems and Netscape can give MICROSOFT a real survival test. The institution structure of the WEB is built on freely formed groups working on projects, without a lot of central control. This is the model for Global Village Schools - maybe we should call Third Wave Schools. RE: A.H. Maslow: The Farther Reaches of Human Nature "Synergy in the Society and Individual" An Esalen, Penguin Books 1976 ISBN 0 14 00.4265 2 Chapter 14, Page 191 Ruth Benedict (Patterns of Culture; Race, Science and Politics) an essay on holism, invented and developed the idea of synergy at lectures at Bryn Mawr College in 1941. Maslow had the only copy which was to be published with the assistance of Margaret Mead in 1970. Benedict tried to overcome the idea of cultural equality ( not everything is right ) and the doctrine of cultural relativity, what ever works for you is OK by me. Societies she said have a flavor, character and are not all equally functional. Some societies are "anxious", surly, nasty, aggressive, and hateful, this come from insecurity and causes low morale. ( such as the Chuckchee, the Ojibwa, The Dobu, and the Kwakiutl) Other societies were "nice" people, affectionate, kind, secure and with high morale. ( Zuni, Arapesh, The L(d)eKota, Eskimo ). The critical element in the concept of synergy is aggression vs. cooperation. Synergy is where individual benefit and groups welfare are in sink. Farming, fishing, hunting can product mutual benefits of cooperation. Selfish self-interest (winner/losers) vs. unselfish, altruism (win/win). Siphoning vs. funneling of wealth, use vs. ownership, Comforting vs. Frightening Religion, high energy or low energy institutions, are characteristics of synergy, where are we ? We have had a out break of win/lose - me and mine - the hell with the hind most, winner take all, activity. This discourages the losers, causes aggression, and is socially dysfunctional. A few institutions maintain high energy but the society is winding down. Synergy is spirit and systems for successful cooperation, institutional means of using aggression (learning for conflict), and rewards for all from social success (tide lifts all boats). RE: Action: The action group, a reason for being. What Am I doing? Now is the time to try men's (and women's) peoples souls! During the first 200 years as a nation each generation was better off, better educated, and in many ways freer that the generations in the past. Freedom is a state of mind. (Sufi and Plato, Masons, science and democracy are linked by the belief in true ideas and ideals) Moral: We are in trouble as a society! The average American (or mean or median) are less informed, more illiterate, less prosperous, than their parents. (The median wages in REAL dollars has not moved since 1969, familial income had gone up a little due to more workers - women in the labor force). Why? Bad values! Short tern, commercial, greed, lack of concern for others, selfless, not understanding the interrelationship of all things and all people, prejudice, bigots, closed minds, hate, and other bad values. Good values as Bill Bennet points out are universal and necessary for a working society. Long term, community, hard work, family, beyond self etc (Stephen Covey) Competition from others countries who are simply better organized to provide for high value added jobs than we are. (Reich) They are have better values, are smarter. better educated, more organized, and their minds are freer from false ideas. Values are an economic issue because of Quality. The inability to cooperate is part of an anti-intellectual, anti- science, anti-technology, anti-reality attitude of people in general and my students in particular. A society where 40% believe in UFO,(not only UFO'S but Aliens that take people aboard to study them) para-psychology, astrology, and other false ideas is in trouble. Carl Sagan made a point of belief in Astrology not simply as a harmless hobby but as a symptom of a lack of understanding the roots of science. The old cowboy, macho, Ayn Rand, the hero in history, attitude of Limbaugh and the groups of right, who are basically nay sayers, plus the religious conservative, (Creationism) some small business and old style populist - not that they are wrong but they just don't understand the issue of reason, science, facts and people working together using rational thought to create new ideas. Psychics, sorcerers, talking snakes, Health Cures, demons, mind power, false prophets, crime, illegitimacy, rip offs, swindles by established financial institution, cheating, corruption, etc are part of the Seneca syndrome. Our current decline in the quality of life is another case of when the culture no-longer can provide a working construct (illusion) there is an outbreak of ghost cults. (Oriental religions in the end of the Roman Empire, and The Cult Explosion today) Money mag. reports that 250,000 of the best and brightest are leaving for places with have a better quality of life. Reimann@digex.net suggests that I use a service such as info@world.std.com to set up a "shell" using a Majordomo as a communications link. I don't understand this but will investigate. Delphi has a BBS at !-888-365-4636 Modem or 695-4005 Voice. The idea is that individual interested in ACTION, in doing something about the steady decline in the quality of life work together to do something. (use WP7944 for BBS id) ************************************************************ RE:New methods new Ideas? With new technology do we do new things or the old things in new ways? The technology in itself does not require we do anything really different. We can teach by the lecture method, with E-mail or HTTP text, have tests and papers just like the days before the printing press. Printing did eventually had some impact on education, the blackboard, the school bus and paved roads, radio, T.V., but not much. The paradigm remained the same. There is a set of information, skills, attitudes which are in the teacher and the "system" and will be transmitted into the student. The process is from outside in. What is "in" the student, their attitudes, skills, goals, hopes, desires, styles, is not very important, what is important is that "they" get the "material" into them. That is what learning means. There is another model, not the Socratic one, which is just another trick to get the ideas and methods from outside into the student. The model is a natural general systems ecological approach where an environment is created that promotes learning. What is learned depends on the learner. Everyone learns something different and in different ways. Total learning is increased but the content varies. We all learn to read but in different ways and what we read is not the same. We all learn to think but not the same things in the same way. The administrative system is education promotes learning but not a fixed agenda of content. The content is the method and the means to learn. Think about it, learning to learn ? From the inside out. The teacher doesn't have the information or stuff of knowledge but is just a friendly helper, guide, coach, who spends her time setting up conditions of learning. The conditions of learning are three. One a stable and friendly group, honest and sincere in concern for each other welfare. Second, rewards and joys, and pleasures and hopes, and fears, and desires, and the complete range of human action is accepted and encouraged; Third a material rich environment where stuff is there for the learner. The new technology can provide the rich environment. It offers a chance for those few who are interested in doing something different (out side the bureaucratic model) a place to met and organize, and maybe have fun. It is not place bound and can break the state monopoly on certification by having a better product. It can be very cost effective in that institutions are now spending more than half their resources on overhead and are being strangled by their own administrative systems. ************************************************ From gapdev@DELTANET.COM To Robert Golden - What about asking how students could help make the school a more exciting and vital place? Tell them the world has changed; they know it. Get them posting their goals for the year; have different grades come together if necessary and share the list. Then ask them the worst things that could happen this year within reason.. things we should all be working to avoid.... get out those fears and get in dialog about what they and you could do if such things happen. Then, presume them to be adults with goals worth honoring. Tell them you Then, presume them to be adults with goals worth honoring. Tell them you need input and guidance for improving quality. Anything has to do with quality which stands in the way of their goals... so have them work in small groups and identify the things about school which waste time and energy from them as they struggle to accomplish their goals. Have groups put these "quality barriers" on flip charts around the room... give kids 5 Avery color dots of each of a variety of colors... red for the ones they think you as principal will have to work from... You'll consider these as their priorities for you. Have them distribute yellow dots on priorities which they hope for attention from teachers. Put green dots on issues which they think students... as individual, or through student government, etc. will have to be involved in tackling. Get a couple teachers who have an ounce of energy left... ask students to volunteer to the green team themes and meet one hour a week after school to develop research and recommendations for you and your staff... these should be presented in the auditorium about Christmas. For the heck of it! The point of what we are doing - we are inventing the future.. Did you see FrontLine Last night. Good program I learned a few things about the commercial side but I don't think they got it quite right. Why interview "futurist" who say the future is uncertain - as if we didn't know. The job is to develop possible futures and "WORK" for those we want.. It's not a passive observation of what they "corporations" will do to "us" the consumer. The family they showed was passive - sit back for entertainment - more movies ? Save a trip to Blockbuster? Maybe that is a corner of a market but the social and Economics will not be really interesting if it's in more movies ? An electronic Mall - good grief.. What social live will there be without the MALL.. Church.. bank, travel agency, these are human contacts as well as commercial transactions - well the ATM was resisted for awhile - people wanted a "person" - they got used to it. The netscape, yahoo, examples are more to the point - quick start venture capital target special needs. NARROWCASTING or individual casting. Not only the Washington Post on line ( an electric newspaper ) but Information on line from the publishers, from book stores, from all over on new books (electric books), this is the problem of breeding electronic Ponies for the pony express rather than looking for opportunities in a really new system like the telegraph. It's not just doing what you did before with new tools (sure a lot of that too) but really new things in new ways. Note on Educational Technology: The only technology to really affect public schools in the last 100 years has been the blackboard - (OK maybe the overhead - telephone ? School BUS, very little from radio, movies, TV, ) the school system remains unchanged since the 1860's, then age of railroads - except it doesn't perform as well, a curriculum set up is 1980, school days so kids could plant and reap, no math invented since the 16'th century, almost no qualified science teachers, 50% of graduates are functional illiterates, the top 2% on national test have less education ( They know and can do less with language, math, science, geography, etc the Average American student is last is all international competitions, the Nation is At RISK ! and nothing happens ...) than the average student in 10 of 13 industrial countries, overhead has increased 100% in two decades, cost have doubled, quality had declined. It's a market ripe for plucking - Silvan learning center growing at 100% a year doing basics because teachers don't know how to teach basics, either do their professors in schools of education that get the lowest 25% of the talent pool. I want to start a national charter computer school. I think we can get part of the public dollar because the civil rights of citizens are being denied by poor quality education. The court could find, Just as black kids could not get a fair start in all black school - so your kids can not get a fair start in a Global economy in most public schools, sure maybe Scarsdale, Shaker Heights, Highland Park, but do you all live there ? Is this equal protection of the laws, is this the foundation of a democratic society, is the economic future of a super-power, do we want a economy dependent of foreign skilled labor, (more that 50% of graduate students in high tech are foreign, 30% of the domestic students are of oriental origin, is this fair ? ) When IBM looked at Xerox copies they studies the number of carbons people used - they didn't understand that new technology generates its own uses. They said there would be 64,000 PC in 1975, they we off by a factor of 100. This is forecasting at the end of a tunnel - tunnel vision. Open up to the big blue sky theory. Follow the money trail.. services, contacts, information, entertainment, sales - depends on the person and the time and place. There is this big INTERNET growing at 15,000 pages a week, maybe 17 million North American users (50% on services like AOL ??? growing at a million a month ??? 35 million world wide.. More Computers sold than TV, the price of Netscape greater then CBS ?? all kinds of special markets. (fishermen, games, politics, interactive tack shows and soaps, 1000's of services) How do they get money - maybe subscription fees, maybe ad's, maybe part of a general fee ( like a cable package) maybe because people just want to do it ? Now in EDUCATION and training there are 30,000 people involved as providers of Distance Education (wild guess) maybe 650,000 students doing remote classes, maybe 1 1/2 to 2% of the market (includes industrial or commercial training - 50% of a 500 billion business, defense schools, special needs, public education, colleges, inservice requirements for teachers, accountants, doctors, other professionals, so 1 or 2 % is less than a billion $ now using remote services. This could be 10 billion by this time next year. Most current services are doing mostly pony express on the electronic network. Here are the lectures - dates - reading - test - just like in traditional teacher talk and textbook classrooms - Some e-mail exchange - a few conferences - chat - but still an electric pony. NOW What ??? I really new thing (Like John Dewey in 1905, Markarenko in the 1920"s, OUTWARD bound) is real interactive groups learning to learn on the web and in work groups. Maybe MOO/Mud maybe Hot Java, maybe something not yet here. More bandwidth (wireless or cable or space via Motorola Clark communications systems. a plan proposed by Clark (2001) in 1948 for 65 low flying (200 miles up rather than 22,000) orbiting transponders) Maybe the market is in in-service certification for accounting, medical updates, work group set ups, you have a project we have the facilities for LAN on WINS. Distribution and library guides.. files and transfer - Go with the flow. We have a few interested in WISDOM, learning to learn - we have a few interested in METHOD - electric communications - We have a few interested in relationships - people to people contacts DYNAMIC SYSTEMS The "yes, indeed" was a memory of dynamic systems at the Harvard Business school seminar (and Slone at MIT) with Ackoff as a focus - vectors, multi-dimensional space, stable and unstable control systems - Tony Ollinger ? and the AI (artificial Intelligence) people from MIT.. (in the late 60's) We did a model for APT (is he still in Cambridge) for Title I of the Education Act - Too complex - I was the public sector (education and policy - economics and social development ) guy. Public policy has not become rational - social interventions are all value issues - Smart systems are people ( using tools ) The Map is not the Territory no matter if it is a three dimensional computer model. Better maps do help but should not be confused with reality. We all live in a virtual reality anyway. The world we see, hear, taste and feel is imperfect sense information filtered by our human-creature-ness, eyes, ears, social programs, prejudices, wants, need, desires, hopes - Color and matter are fancy energy illusions that give impression we must believe. I have become interested in biological systems of perception, of chemical thoughts and electrical transmitters. This gives us a more solid base to figure out the human condition, the nature of reality as people come to know reality, the meaning of life, and how to improve it's quality. Sufi physics from RUMI in the 13th century are almost right on target of the modern version ? How did they know about atoms, energy fields, the forces in the Universe ? Are we not part of this world of nature - maybe inside us (Know thyself) we can sense the order and mystery of creation itself / too mystic for you ? Try atomic physics, more mystic that the Sufi.. Before reality reveals itself the noise of false impressions and social programming need to be cleared away. We need to "think again" and see, hear, feel, know in different ways. The shades are removed for the eyes, the light shines - enlightment - not a new idea. SPQR the Roman System (Church and State) You know the Roman Empire fell of it's own weight. (Gibons) The protestant reformation was about the powers of an executive bureaucracy. (Weber) The Mayas workers just picked up a left when the tax rate was too high. The History of China, for 5,000 years, is the Yin and Yang of central and decentralized power. The center brings order but get oppressive which sparks rebellions and war lords and chaos a new strong ruler. The American System of Government is congressional where the Speaker of the House was the most important figure in Federal Government for with most of our history. (Wilson) The power is in the hands of war lords called committee chairmen and policy is called log rolling. Lincoln (and to some extent Roosevelt, one of the few presidents more powerful than the speaker - but Joe Cannon could make a case ) ignored the constitution then rewrote it. The original idea was to give very limited powers to a federal state. We could try that again. IBM, GM, CBS, were the local lords of their day, and their day has almost past, they are in the twilight of history. According to Hagel (and Marx ) the thesis of the corporate state is meeting the anti-thesis of the Z organization, small is beautiful, less is more, fast, creative, moral and meaningful beyond material gain. The bottom line has changed. The consumer society, were frantic families are working hard in stupid jobs, to keep up the mortgage, the car payments, the credit card bills, are buying themselves into dis-illusion with the commercial, material, superficial, false frills of fashions of current relativist value free society.(while the children go to hell and bad public schools) We have meet the enemy: who are is our best and most creative element of our civilization - commercials and psychological manipulation. The glory of product images and the happiness they bring is so wrong and successful, MTV and Bill Clinton, only being a leading edge of all commercials and false hopes. Education is "face the truth and the truth shall make you free". There is no freedom ( An ancient Greek argument ) for those whose lives are false, living in a dream, asleep, unaware, intellectually comatose. Commercial are just so designed to produce slavery, tyranny to THINGS, to externals that make false promises, the whispers and temptations of the devil himself. That's why values and character matter - I'll go with the General (Powell) because he has character - policy doesn't matter much or does the president for that matter. It's mostly show so we may hire another professional actor. Who gets what, when and how is a power play. The masses are not even in the audience, and the public address system doesn't give the real score. It's all a "human interest" story on sound and fury that signify nothing, the evening TV news is the muttering of mad people, Bengie (in the sound and the fury) like me...