The attack on NYC cannot be justified, ignored or appeased but must be understood and resolved by the reduction of the root causes.
The impossible dream:
Changing the topic:
Dr. W.
Edwards Deming, http://www.deming.org/
is the greatest social and political thinker of our times. http://www.well.com/user/vamead/demingdist.html
The issue is to fix the problem NOT the blame. That
systems are at fault not people who work is broken systems.
Inspection only makes it worse – the paradigm shift is
from inspection to quality – and quality is not something external, but
internal, standard can not be imposed from outside but contained inside. Zen
and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.
If we apply these principles to the Roman Catholic
Bishops, to the problem of Sadam in Iraq, to the Israel Palestine conflict, to
the issue of corporation responsibility and honesty, to the issue of Homeland
defense, to public education and almost all other issues – we find that the
issue is badly defined, the questions wrong and the answers not as helpful as
we think.
The issue is only Child abuse as a symptom – the
quality of leadership and how the system picks leaders, and how leaders relate
to their staff (priests) and members is the real issue. As the representatives
of the Body of Christ on Earth they have to be spiritually connected, pure,
and indifferent to their own welfare, position, careers, and are NOT. We need
a community of saints and have one of careerist bureaucrats. At the Bishops
conference we hear morally floppy and nit picking careerist, we did not hear
the clear voice of universal truth, that is a hard issue –
One man is not a country or the cause of a problem –
assassination is not an answer. Either
for Bin Laden, Arafat, Castro or Hussein the problem is in the system, the
state of reality not the person. The
entire evil axis is military dictatorships based on force of arms and secret
police as in many other places as Saudi Arabia, Africa etc., and the most of
the other half of the world. The
issue is of civil society – more open, more modern, more democratic, so the
issue is not one nasty regime here and another there but how to bring the
other half or two thirds of humanity into the modern world. That is a hard
issue –
In corporate responsibility or accountability for public
education only honesty works – rules, laws, tests, audits, inspections just
drive everyone crazy or make for more clever crooks. How to have honest,
responsible, goal orientated leadership rather than careerist, greed,
short-term survivors, is a hard question – how are they selected, how
promoted, how do they view themselves and their job?
The cleaner Bureaucratic organization can make the
government more effective in defense of the homeland and bureaucratic
confusion can make it less effective and more expensive. But no structure
assures success but some can assume failure. It all depends on naturism,
reality, patriotism, sincerity of leaders and followers over career goals –
“Don’t you know there is a war on” should focus action and attitudes.
This is a hard issue in an age of egoism, materialism and operational values.
Getting beyond “me first” is a hard issue -
Short cuts, easy answers, slogans go so far – hard choices and changes in attitudes take longer. Better people, with better values, do a better job – the job of the organization is to provide the structure that hires, promotes, supports, and provides the right tools, to those motivated people. Better Bishops, better National Leadership, better corporate leaders, better educators, and better bureaucrats – Elite colleges had this job – family traditions, the church, but all have become politically correct, weak, confused and un vibrant in their own right. It is a hard issue -
"Fellow
citizens, we cannot escape history."
"The dogmas
of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled
high with difficulty and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new,
so we must think anew and act anew. We must disenthrall ourselves and then we
will save our country."
[Annual Message to Congress, December 1, 1862]
That is what he
said. That is what Abraham Lincoln said.
"Fellow
citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this congress and this
administration will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal
significance or insignificance can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial
through which we pass will light us down in honor or dishonor to the latest
generation. We, even we here, hold the power and bear the
responsibility."
[Annual Message to Congress, December 1, 1862]
He was born in
Kentucky, raised in Indiana, and lived in Illinois. And this is what he said.
This is what Abe Lincoln said.
"The dogmas
of the quiet past are inadequate to the stormy present. The occasion is piled
high with difficulty and we must rise with the occasion. As our case is new,
so we must think anew and act anew. We must
disenthrall ourselves and then we will save our country."
[Annual Message
to Congress, December 1, 1862]
http://www.people.virginia.edu/~skd9r/409/portrait.html
President
Roosevelt changed the management of mobilization in May 1943. The new Office
of War Mobilization under James F. Byrnes had broader authority, extending to
manpower as well as to all functions formerly carried out by Nelson. So Byrnes
brought together management of the two main categories of mobilization.
Because of his broad powers, Byrnes became known as the "assistant
president."
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/documents/mobpam.htm
As World War II
escalated, the Office of War Mobilization was developed by Congress; Byrnes
was appointed its director. It was from here that policies originated and
programs were planned for the war. All the war agencies which were connected
with the production, procurement, transportation, and distribution of both
civilian and military aspects of the war were governed by Mr. Byrnes. Because
of his close involvement with President Roosevelt, Byrnes often was called the
"Assistant President."
http://www.byrnesscholars.org/history/whiteyrs.htm
The Thousands
of Devils in the details:
There is a
danger of both types of errors: Type I is to do something in a rush that is
not helpful but creates confusion
Type II is
not doing something that is critically necessary
So the best
choice is to reauthorize the Government reorganizations statues that allowed
the President to make proposals that Congress could veto but not
change.
And grant
temporary powers to do what FDR did in WWII and Wilson and Baruch did in WWI and Lincoln
did in the Civil War - mobilization - direct orders from the Commander in
Chief (via a Deputy) to get thinks done quickly, move money, people,
authority, cut red tape (public comment, purchase requirements)
Hard Choices:
Lack of a chain
of command on mobilization of Homeland Security is the critical element –
Coast Guard radios can’t talk to customs, INS computers don’t connect to
FBI or CIA watch lists, or do the State Departments visa offices connect to
anyone, etc. Putting them all together is a big job – because they don’t
come in neat packages. People labeled activities as anti-terrorist because it
helped raise money - it was the issue of the year so a lot of people jumped
aboard and now are being threaten by being jerked off.
Speed is critical
- the complexity of the job is great - so there is not time for a lot more
studies and reports so the James F. Byrnes model is useful.
If we took the
Office of War Mobilization model – a deputy President is empowered to act,
to order, to fire, to move money, under a war powers act. Maybe a
executive order will be done as the legislation bogs down.
Mr. Ridge now has
more power just based on the threat of action.
The
first task has to be prevention by good intelligence operations -
there
are just too many targets, ways and means to use "target hardening"
of thousands of facilities - money wasted is money lost to more useful
activity. The plan is a little weak on hard infiltration, interception,
surveillance, and interruption of the few thousand really bad guys while making
a lot of innocent people suffer.
The
first priority is spies and informants the second is computers -
To get the computer systems into the field in months not years:
I
would suggest the model of WWII Patterson's office centralized Army
mobilization efforts in the War Department, with William Knudsen of General
Motors commissioned a lieutenant general and assigned to the office of the
undersecretary as director of production. At last, with the United States
officially at war, it began to develop the kind of organization that had
worked in World War I and had been recommended in the industrial mobilization
plan.
From
this time on, the Army and Navy Munitions Board declined in importance, and a
new organization emerged within the Army to manage procurement. A command
called Services of Supply was set up in March 1942 under Lt. Gen. Brehon B.
Somervell. For the rest of the year, industrial mobilization to meet the
Army's needs was his principal concern. General George C. Marshall, the chief
of staff, looked to Somervell as his adviser on supply, and Somervell provided
the link between the mobilization and production functions of Patterson's
office and the G-4 requirements and supply distribution responsibilities. One
of the most adept empire builders in the modern history of the Army, Somervell
Left,
General Knudsen (National
Archives);
right,
General Somervell. (DA
photograph)
merged the staffs of the undersecretary's office and the G-4 into one operating agency, the Directorate of Procurement and Distribution, and attached it to his office. His organization was renamed Army Service Forces in March 1943.
-
Office of War Mobilization - James
F. Byrnes, Associate
Justice of the United States Supreme Court from July 1941 until his
resignation on October 3, 1942, to head the wartime Office of Economic
Stabilization until May 1943; director of the Office of War Mobilization,
executive order to get this done now.
http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/documents/mobpam.htm
The
second task is response - biological infections which is being done OK
The
third task is border security, INS and visa control - restriction for 10
million poorly or undocumented non-citizens -
There
are some interesting and important differences in homeland security:
The Department Secretary’s
Duties
The
Organization proposed by Introduced May 2, 2002 By Senators
Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., Arlen Specter, R-Pa., and Bob Graham, D-Fla., and
Reps. Mac Thornberry, RTexas, Jane Harman, D-Calif., Ellen Tauscher, D-Calif.,
and James Gibbons, R-Nev.
:Leaves
out the secret service, some programs at Energy and Health Human Services - in
the Presidents plan goes further but leaves FBI/CIA alone -
The Secretary’s
duties would include:
Developing policies, goals,
and plans to promote homeland security
Working with state and local
governments to protect homeland security
Conducting exercise and
training programs for federal employees involved in homeland security
Establishing effective command
and control procedures for the range of potential contingencies, including
those that may require
military support
Developing a response plan for
homeland security and emergency preparedness
The Department’s
Composition
The authorities, functions,
personnel and assets of the following agencies would be transferred to the
Department of Homeland Security:
The Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) and its 10 regional offices
The United States Customs
Service
Immigration and Naturalization
Service enforcement functions, including the Border Patrol
The United States Coast Guard
The Agriculture Department
quarantine inspector functions
The Critical Infrastructure
Assurance Office now located within the Commerce Department
The National Infrastructure Protection Center and
the National Domestic Preparedness Office, now located within the FBI
An office of Science and
Technology would be established to advise the Secretary on research and
development and other science priorities.
The bill authorizes $200
million to help develop homeland security technologies.
The Department’s
Organization
The Department would be
divided into three sections: border security, protecting critical
infrastructure, including computer systems, and
emergency preparedness and
response.
Title II
Director of the National
Office for Combating Terrorism within the White House
The director would be
appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.
The director would be an
advisor to the National Security Council
The Director’s
Duties
The director’s
duties will include:
Developing and reviewing a
comprehensive national assessment of terrorist threats
Developing, with the
department secretary, a comprehensive strategy to combat terrorism
Coordinating and overseeing
the execution of the strategy by federal agencies
Developing, with the
department secretary, an annual budget to implement the strategy
Exercising budget review and
certification authority over programs in the terrorism prevention and response
budget.
Title III
National Strategy to Combat
Terrorism
The National Strategy to
Combat Terrorism will be developed collaboratively by the department secretary
and the White House director.
The secretary will have the
lead role on issues of border security, critical infrastructure protection,
emergency preparation and response, and
integration with state and
local efforts.
The director will take the
lead on strategic planning concerning intelligence and military assets, law
enforcement and diplomacy.
A non-partisan, nine-member
panel of outside experts will be established to provide an assessment of the
terrorism strategy.
http://www.senate.gov/~gov_affairs/homelandsummary2002.pdf
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/12/politics/12CONG.html
What is the difference?
We need a new organization – let the FBI chase crooks;
let the CIA collect and analyze information but let us have a new organization
to be proactive about terrorist. We
need a new national security agency – really secret – (hidden in the NSA
and DOD) employing many foreigners who know their way around and the languages
and cultures. Let them form the strategies to break up, assassinate,
infiltrate, and using contractors not limited by law or tradition and be quiet
about it.
The FBI is very good at tracking down criminals – in
carefully examining every piece of evidence – of following every lead and
finding criminals. Why is it so hard to use the same skills in finding and
disrupting terrorist?
People who have done the crime know that they are being
hunted. The hunters build a case that goes to court. They can check every
hardware store in five states, every phone call, every drop of blood, but
everyone know they are doing it. They don’t have to be secret about it.
People suspected of being dangerous may not have done
anything. It is vital that they are unaware that they are being tracked and
are under surveillance. In the spy business there are complex techniques for
monitoring activities while not getting caught. FBI agents are not very good
at being under cover, at counter intelligence, or abstract analysis.
The CIA is basically in the business of buying stolen
information. They “hand out the shingle” with known “field officers”
with an office as the political officer in the Embassy. They wait for people
to contact them with something to sell at a price. They hire spies but don’t
do many dangerous field activities themselves. This does not work very well
with terrorist – they just don’t show up at our door. Informers have to be
recruited, trained, infiltrated, and protected from disclosure. The fact that
dozens are exposed because of sloppy fieldwork makes working for the CIA a
very high-risk occupation.
Connecting the dots:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/programmes/analysis.shtml
1993 – Defense analysis reports on the danger of terrorism including the danger of al Qaeda martyr brigades use of Airplanes to attack the Whitehouse or the Pentagon – aircraft likely to be used as weapons – several more such reports up to a 1999 reports with specific analysis of suicide bombers using aircraft (with explosives or fuel) are identified in national security reports – It is not a new or un imagined idea
1993 Attempt to blow up twin trade towers
1994 – Algerian terrorist attempt to fly a highjacked commercial airline into landmarks in Paris with a heavy load of fuel stopped on ground by storming the aircraft. (Therefore it is not true no one imagined such a possibility of driving aircraft into landmarks)
1995 Various plots discovered in the Philippines by Arab terrorist to use aircraft as weapons
1999 Reports of possible air attack by suicide bombers on the G7 in Italy
2001 – Report from FBI in Arizona about suspicious Arabs taking flying lessons
One such Arab (accused of being one of the team of 9/11 with phone
numbers linking him to the leadership of the attack) He was reported as being
very suspicious and was arrested in Minnesota but computer and documents not
searched or reported to terrorist taskforces at DoD or CIA.
The dots are there – but there was no (as there still
is not) a central organization or computer system to put them together (of 13
intelligence agencies many in DOD, but also drug agencies, state department,
customs, coast guard, ATF et al). There was and is no linkage between foreign
information and domestic law enforcement. Prevention is not like making a
criminal case for a court of law. The issue is not perusing a crime but
finding out what is going on by infiltration, information gathering, and
analysis.
The NSA has the computer power to review millions of pieces of data a minute and could have tracked the connections – al Qaeda, Aircraft, highjack, flight schools, the report from Minnesota and Arizona, tracks to who took lessons (and had an interest in crop dusters) right to the bombers themselves who were using their own names to buy tickets and rent cars. In short better police work could have stopped the attacks of 9/11. Not for sure but it is quite possible –AND more important We are not much better organized today to find and disrupt attacks – it is still business as usual (stove pipes) without a central point of analysis. Therefore it is of vital importance to track the record and fix the broken links.
Clear and present danger:
As at least six independent reports on America's response to terrorism target the lack of coordination as a clear and present danger to national security. Over the last decade these studies (by high raking expert people) have reported the key problem - the 35 agencies with anti-terrorist function, and dozens more with response capacities, are poorly organized to find and disrupt attacks or respond to the new threats. The new office of homeland security is too weak and itself dysfunctional. In WW I (the War Industries Board with Bernard M. Baruch and in WWII James F. Byrnes with director of economic stabilization (1942) and later (1943) director of war mobilization.) this office created Deputy Presidents whose orders were followed, period. This is what is clearly needed NOW.
http://www.wiredbrain.net/terror.htm
The senators, Patrick J. Leahy, Democrat of Vermont; Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa; and Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, raised questions about the bureau's performance in a letter sent on Friday to the F.B.I. director, Robert S. Mueller III.
http://www.landfield.com/isn/mail-archive/2000/Jun/0130.html
Last month, the Attorney General released an update of the
Department's
five-year, Counter-Terrorism plan. The plan is classified and I cannot
comment on the specifics. But I can say that the absence of details as to
how Justice is developing key national capabilities is symptomatic of a
poorly-conceived mission, and a lack of operational capability.
http://www.emergency.com/cntrterr.htm
http://www.disastercenter.com/terror.htm
http://www.wheretodoresearch.com/Terrorism.htm
http://www.alternet.org/issues/?IssueAreaID=27
Report
from the National Commission on Terrorism -- Countering The Changing Threat
Of International Terrorism,(PDF)
CBIAC FEMA 2000
Presentation
National
Commission on Terrorism -- Countering the Changing Threat of International
Terrorism - June 16, 2000
Dept. of State --
Response to Terrorism June 16, 2000
http://www.senate.gov/~grassley/releases/2002/p02r5-15.htm
Peace
and prosperity:
There
is a growing Global awareness that peace and prosperity depend on two factors.
The World Economic Form, Tony Blair and many elements of the international
elite, the intellectual media and average people know that the world is very
unbalanced, out of joint, unequal, and unstable because of the vast and
growing gap between the first world: the modern secular scientific,
technological, democratic, economical advanced and highly specialized world of
about one billion (Per Capita Income - PCI over $10,000), in North America
Europe, some in Latin America, Japan and parts of Asia: (The G8)
The
second world (was USSR and its empire) is now the billion semi-developed (PCI
around or over $1,500) with India having a bigger middle class than Great
Britain – a growing middle class in Latin America and China – and a
growing gap with -
And the
Third world: three billion primitive, superstitious, illiterate, with archaic
authorities both in government and religion, (PCI about or under a dollar a
day)
The
second great issue comes from the first – terrorism which uses the tools of
modern economies for the ends of ancient ideologies and cultures. SO:
Yes, we
need to go after terrorist and those that could supply them with weapons of
mass destruction (WMD) but avoid making social and political condition worse,
more angry, as they become helpless in the face of technological warfare –
hopelessness does not mean passive -
But we need to improve conditions in the “Third World”
But
with local development – local enterprise – education and infrastructure
to give people hope and economically active – using the Taiwan, South Korea,
– model – an authorities promote education and industrial development –
partly global but also local –
If the
first world supported universal education – there would be millions of
school teachers as lower middle class and semi-literate people – a base to
build better services and enterprises, improved health – the average age of
the third world is under 18 – so about a billion school children – or at
100 to one that is 10 million teachers – at $1,000 each – is only 10
billion – (not good schools – but schools) supplemented by NGO’s and
local resources. The
goal is 90% literacy at the 5th grade level in a few years for a
billion children and young adults. The 10 million teachers require high school
or normal school training but it could be done – better than 50 billion more
defense expenditures.
The program could be run by the UN working with NGO’s.
The real and the ideal – both are required -
35 Then
one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and
saying, 36 Master,
which is the great commandment in the law? 37 Jesus
said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with
all thy soul, and with all thy mind. 38 This
is the first and great commandment. 39 And
the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. 40 On
these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
|
|
|
Matthew
22: 1 - 46 - |
http://www.biblestudytools.net/OnlineStudyBible/bible.cgi?passage=mt+22&version=kjv&showtools=0
The world as we experience it is partly illusion. We have familiarity with a flat earth that stands still while the sun rises and falls over us. Science requires special care and methods to validate experience with experiments, observations and confirmations. Science cannot fathom the spirit or dreams of humans and other animals. These imaginary worlds are real in our heads, shaped by our social environment where those around us confirm dreams as reality and illusions are facts. The all too solid earth is mostly space between forces called atoms which behave in ways completely out of our awareness.
The romantic love of God leading to a mystic union with the beloved is beyond everyday people and life, the idea of true selflessness, outside our tribal families, is also unlikely and rare. But people keep trying to be more spiritual, more kind, better members of the holy family or church and try to behave, believe, and act by the ideals of the community of saints.
In the same way we can not make a perfect world, we can not solve everyone’s problems, so the great divide between the fifth of the earths people who live in technical cultures with their wealth, military and economic power and the 3/5th of peoples and cultures left behind, tribal, superstitious, primitive, poor, and the gap keeps growing – the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer and more numerous and a greater proportion of all peoples.
The well off cannot live in peace and prosperity in such a world. There are no gates high enough, there are no seas wide enough, and there are no mountains that can keep the technically dependent cultures from the disruption of irregular warfare. Security is our world is an illusion and an impossible dream – just as the Christian message and salvation by faith alone is only conjure based on hope and fantasy. BUT we must keep trying or just become a pragmatic, practical, materialist nation and people, without high culture, poetry, having no vaster ambitions, beyond history – we need to live in history knowing where we came from and where we want to go, having a sense of mission for humanity - BUT –
Legends, Myths and Fairy Tales;
Wars and personal conflicts become violent when both sides do not figure out each other and the others intentions. World War I was a classic lack of understanding as explained in the “Guns of August” by Barbara W. Tuchman which JFK asked people read during the Cuban missile crisis. Understanding does not mean approval. Napoleon and Germany underestimated Russia as did Japan fail to take a realistic view of American power, southerners did not know what the North would do to preserve the union, the Allies did not prepare for German aggression because they did not take seriously the nature of the threat, thus conflict comes when there is a lack of realism.
The lack of realism is due not to both sides just being stupid or stubborn, while there is always plenty of that, they always remember where they buried the last hatchet, BUT because of false beliefs, legends, myths, and fairy tales – racism, nationalism, Nazi romantic mythology, Japanese jingoism and cults, Southern cultural mythology preserved in “gone with the wind”, communism, Christian crusades, British imperialism, the ugly American bully capitalist cultural and economic empire and other sad stories of people with false beliefs and passionate attachments to dreams and fairy tales based on a little knowledge showing little interest in paying attention to the concerns, character and intentions of others. Extreme Moslems do not understand us and we don’t understand them and neither side cares to change the situation.
Imaginary stories are important and powerful, from history, tribal customs, religion, entertainment, politics, and the dreamland of the collective consciousness. Yes, Santa Claus is a vigorous and good spirit, Virginia, as are Joe Hill and Thomas Jefferson who will be in spirit where ever men are not free, along with the evil one, the great devil, and how Disney made it’s fortune retelling European children’s story. Our history as is most a narration dominated by legends and myths used to increase loyalty and self love. We know and love ourselves and know how we are superior and better than others. We love ourselves much better than our neighbors because we are better than they are. Osama bin Laden’s mythology is similar; he knows he is superior to the corrupt Americans.
We have helped to create and fallen for Osama bin Laden’s mythology, he believed we were the weak horse and would not be capable of massive response. Clearly both sides do not know each other and the conflict increases the misunderstanding and makes legends and myths more important as patriotism takes over from curiosity. Blowback is when people believe in their own propaganda, how wonderful they are, how evil the enemy is, how god is on their side. Nationalism takes the form of the cultural and the religious moralist and superiority of certain knowledge.
Several forms of mythology about America are now in conflict – Some have heard and believe the story that America is a specially divine place, a Zion, separate from the gross materialism and power politics of the old world which is in conflict with the myth of America as the great fiend, as a evil imperialist empire. Both stories are powerful but false legends, as are the legends in Palestine and Israel, so real people die real deaths involved in the unreal popular fairy tales that become doctrine and articles of faith. Nations are shaped and formed by their myths, people come together united in vague dreams and stories, such as the legends of the “Holy Land”, America’s mission to humanity, the Nation of Islam, international socialism, racism, dreams of the after life, heaven and hell, stories often told and sometimes beloved, commonly believed, and unlikely to be questioned.
This blind belief causes the lack of interest in the reality of the enemy, causes gross mistakes and a clear and present danger to real security and safety BUT built into human culture and psychology. This doesn’t mean we give up and fall into a crude existentialism, or any of several philosophical systems of the 20th century.
Or logical positivism, also known as scientific EMPIRICISM, modern school of philosophy that in the 1920s attempted to introduce the methodology and precision of mathematics to the study of philosophy, much as had been done in symbolic logic (see LOGIC). Led by the Vienna Circle, a group including the philosophers Rudolf CARNAP and Moritz Schlick and the mathematician Kurt GÖDEL, the logical positivists held that metaphysical speculation is nonsensical; that logical and mathematical propositions are tautological; and that moral and value statements are merely emotive. The function of philosophy, they maintained, is to clarify concepts in both everyday and scientific language. The movement received its inspiration from the work of FREGE, Bertrand RUSSELL, WITTGENSTEIN, and G.E. MOORE. The Vienna Circle disintegrated in the late 1930s after the Nazis took Austria, but its influence spread throughout Europe and America, and its concept, particularly its emphasis on the analysis of language as the function of philosophy, has been carried on throughout the West.
KIERKEGAARD developed a Christian existentialism that recognized the concrete ethical and religious demands confronting the individual, who is forced each time to make a subjective commitment. The necessity and seriousness of these decisions cause him dread and despair. Following Kierkegaard, HEIDEGGER and SARTRE, both students of HUSSERL, were the major thinkers of the movement. Heidegger rejected the label of existentialism, describing his philosophy as an investigation of the nature of being in which the analysis of human existence is only a first step. For Sartre, the only self-declared existentialist among the major thinkers, existence precedes essence: there is no God and no fixed human nature; thus, each person is totally free and entirely responsible for what he or she becomes and does. This responsibility accounts for human dread and anguish. Sartre influenced the writings of CAMUS and de BEAUVOIR. A Christian existentialism was developed in France by Gabriel Marcel, a Roman Catholic. The religious thinkers Karl BARTH, Paul TILLICH, Reinhold NIEBUHR, and Martin BUBER, and the philosopher Karl JASPERS are often included in the orbit of existentialism.
Pakistan said today that it had detained two retired nuclear scientists after the recent discovery in offices they had used in Afghanistan of documents describing ways to use anthrax as a weapon and other suspicious material.
The diagrams of the balloons seem to show a possible method for slowly dispersing some type of biological or chemical agent from the air. Words scribbled in the diagram appear to say "cyanide."
One diagram found in the Kabul offices show four balloons flying together in tandem with a box around them. The box appears to show how the agent would be dispersed across a wide area.
The house, like others in the Afghan capital apparently used by Osama bin Laden's terrorist network, Al Qaeda, seems to have been hastily abandoned when the Taliban fled Kabul two weeks ago. It is not clear who may have been in the house since then,
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25220
http://www.wnd.com/news/printer-friendly.asp?ARTICLE_ID=25220
A diagram and assembly instructions for a dirty bomb have been found in Afghanistan in recent weeks, bolstering the view that bin Laden's recent boast that he had nuclear weapons might not have been hollow.
Most worrying, however, are intelligence reports leaked to Bob Woodward, the Washington Post's Watergate reporter, which detail a meeting this year at which the unnamed al-Qa'eda operative produced the supposed canister of radioactive material.
According to the report, fear of a radiological bomb explains why vice-president Dick Cheney is so rarely seen alongside President Bush, and spends most of his time at a secure location outside the capital.
Fear of a risk to the president's life from a sniper or a car bomb would not explain why Mr. Cheney is so frequently outside Washington.
So far as is known, no radiological bomb has ever been detonated, but they could be extremely simple to assemble and transport once the bombers had obtained and learnt how to handle the nuclear material.
The most likely means of detonating a "dirty" explosion would be with a quantity of Semtex high explosive packed together with radioactive material such as spent fuel rods, probably stolen from a nuclear installation.
The bomb would not cause enormous physical damage, but would be designed to pollute a city with huge levels of radioactive poisoning. "You could carry that around in a suitcase, that's the problem," said Richard Butler, former head of the United Nations team which investigated Saddam Hussein's nuclear and chemical ambitions.
Given the simplicity of the technology of the bomb, CIA concerns are focused on al-Qa'eda's ability to obtain the nuclear material.
Pakistan has detained two scientists in its own covert nuclear programme, and questioned them about their links to groups in Afghanistan. One of them was reportedly assigned a desk job after publicly backing the Taliban.
By 1937, the ambitious Ishii had established a vast germ warfare complex in Pingfan, a small village outside the Manchurian city of Harbin. The complex, innocuously dubbed Unit 731, was composed of over 150 buildings and nearly 3,500 researchers and employees.
Ishii's scientists concentrated their studies on anthrax, as well as typhus, plague, cholera, botulism, smallpox, tularemia and encephalitis.
In addition to anthrax-filled artillery shells, Unit 731 experimented extensively with hot-air balloons filled with the deadly disease.
Declassified documents from Fort Detrick, a military research facility in Frederick, Md., (the installation's name was changed from Camp Detrick after the war) partially portray a frightening scenario that might have been had World War II gone on much longer.
Beginning in late 1944, areobiologists at Camp Detrick were placed on high alert after several reports were received from western states that large balloons, some up to 150 feet around, had been sighted silently floating over populated areas.
After the Allied victory over Japan, U.S. Army and intelligence agents also moved swiftly to capture Japan's Unit 731 anthrax-bomb technology and other research. The initial job fell to Col. Murray Sanders, a Camp Detrick (its name during the war) bacteriologist. Earlier, Sanders had been part of Camp Detrick's investigation team into the Japanese balloon incidents. Sanders had sounded the first alarm about the mysterious balloons flying over the U.S. possibly being armed with anthrax.
Decades later, in an interview, Sanders said, "Anthrax is a tough bug. It's sturdy. It's cheap to produce, and [the Japanese had] used it in China." In a 1985 interview with the Miami Herald,
A declassified Department of Army report dated Feb. 24, 1977, contains a lengthy list of locations where "biological field testing of anti-personnel biological simulates involving the public domain" were held. Included on the list are San Francisco, Panama City, Florida, Washington, D.C., Hawaii and New York City. In 1953 and 1954, Fort Detrick scientists working with the CIA conducted secret tests with anthrax simulates in New York City's subway system.
Judith Miller, Stephen Engelberg and William Broad, the article told of a secret CIA project, code-named Clear Vision, that since 1996 built and tested several model anthrax bombs that were replicated on "a Soviet-designed germ bomb that agency officials feared was being sold on the international market."
The CIA project grew out of concerns that Russian scientists "had implanted genes from Bacillus cereus, an organism that causes food poisoning, into the anthrax microbe."
We
are that close to Martial Law:
With
military courts, National Guard troops at critical facilities, and a
reorganized “homeland” command structure – we are prepared for martial
law if and when the civilian system fails when under attack. Lincoln did it
– arrested the mayor of Biltmore for rebellion, hung draft rioters in New
York, more or less sent the Supreme Court Home, surrounded the capitol with
troops, he rules by decree and got legislation after the fact, in order to
fight the war and preserve the union. Bush is no Churchill or is he a
Lincoln – but what you see is what you get.
RE:
'Overkill' anthrax in letter to Leahy Envelope likely spread spores to
others
<<How
many American lives will be sacrificed for foreign policy objectives? >>
Peter,
I find this a perverse question.
Neither
our enemy nor our military see them as terrorists or criminals – that is
rhetoric. Both the enemy and
our military leaders understand that we are fighting an asymmetrical war.
It is the only way the weak can fight the strong, as you’ve said
before.
If
the enemy had the forces we have, they would be using their nuclear
weapons and their daisy cutters on our cities.
Americans would not be hit because they happened to live next door
to an Air Force base. They
would be hit because they lived in New York or Atlanta.
Would
you call that black-mail (anthrax means black carbuncle, malignant pustule - sent in the mail)? If
they offered to cease their terror bombing conditional upon our surrender
would that be black-mail (anthrax means black carbuncle, malignant pustule - sent in the mail)? Of
course not. It would be war.
Conversely,
if we were to “tough it out”, and persevere in the war, accepting our
losses and inflicting worse, knowing we were fighting for nothing less
than the survival of our culture, how could one say we were sacrificing
our own lives “for foreign policy objectives?”
To call the defense of Western civilization a foreign policy
objective is downright weird.
What
if the Brits had asked the same question of Churchill?
They would today be speaking a scary dialect of German. (The
question is do we have the quality of the Brits who stood alone in 1940 or
are we a spoiled, softies who run at the first scare - Anthrax is been
mainly a scare where the response has done more damage that the problem -
my vote is that we will not stand but will run in circles waving our arms
in the air with panic - and our dysfunctional political system can not
withstand much - and since the political system is broken and the Republic
will fall apart under attack because Bush is no Churchill, Congress is no
parliament, Americans are no Brits – and the Military will take over
under military rule and law to preserve the union – they are ready –
no one else is )
No,
they are not doing anything remotely resembling “black-mail (anthrax means black carbuncle, malignant pustule - sent in the mail)”.
Nor are we pursuing a “foreign policy objective.”
We are fighting a war in which they use (by necessity perhaps) more
ugly methods than we.
(Of
course, you may just be having fun with words -- the word “Anthrax”
translates “black” and it’s in the mail!
But this would be lost on many.)
The issue is there is NO discussion that in a "real" war real people get killed - and civilian populations have been targets since the use of air power - i.e. for a long time in real wars. ( I was "a baby born under bombs" in Barcelona in Oct 1936 - Italians and Germans - terror bombing was a new idea and quite a scandal in Spain - )
We have never been attacked at home (since 1812) and domestic population have never been under the gun - the MAD thing with USSR was a game -
We have acted as if there are NO consequences of our behavior of pushing people around - bomb Iraq, support Israelis occupation of the territories (what ever we say we always support Israel because of the Jewish lobby power in US politics)
Links
and Books
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/bioterror/linksandbooks.html
Practical,
realistic Idealism:
The only way I see of doing anything useful about 9-11 is an extreme form of idealism – We need to work toward a global community with real standards (such as exist within a civil society) a real global community – this is going to be hard but is absolutely necessary. It will take a long time and be very expensive, and may require real sacrifice, but there is no alternative.
In a civil society we do not settle issue with violence as a matter of doing regular business (crime is crime and has a criminal justice system) and in an interdependent global society we need to do the same. We must have Global systems of justice – commercial law, social justice, participation, (open societies) and criminal justice – world police, courts, laws and security. Nothing else will do. Normal nationalism is a threat to our safety and survival. National welfare depends on global welfare.
Some
form of global warfare, public health, with an international safety net –
costing trillions is required (and could be the stimulus the global economy
needs) – because a better off poor would be a market and able to afford
basic infrastructure. America and Europe have well off customers, the world
could have billions more.
Since
we don’t know how to do international assistance without corruption and
great waste – supports and privileges for private enterprise is critical
– plans that actually work and produce income and return on investments.
There are lots of these enterprises under free trade – We need
International venture capital, basic education (direct provision) banking,
and direct construction of roads, communications by private contractors,
while we work on getting civil society and working governments. Trusteeships
may be required in some places.
Believe
me this is the only way to fight terror.
The New York Times
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/articles/blairtext_100201.html
Blair:
Around the world, the 11th of
September is bringing government and people to reflect, consider and change.
And in this process, amidst all the talk of war and action, there is another
dimension appearing, there is a coming together; the power of community is
asserting itself. We are realizing how fragile are our frontiers in the face
of the world's new challenges.
Today, conflicts rarely stay
within national boundaries. Today, a tremor in one financial market is
repeated in the markets of the world. Today, confidence is global; it's
presence or its absence. Today, the threat is chaos, because for people with
work to do and family life to balance and mortgages to pay and careers to
further pensions to provide, the yearning is for order and stability. And if
it doesn't exist elsewhere, it's unlikely to exist here.
I have long believed that this interdependence defines the new world we live in.
The critics will say, ``But how
can the world be a community, nations act in their own self-interest.'' Of
course, they do, but what is the lesson of the financial markets, climate
change, international terrorism, nuclear proliferation or world trade? It is
that our self-interest and our mutual interest are today inextricably woven
together.
This is the politics of
globalization. And I realize why people protest against globalization. We
watch aspects of it with trepidation, we feel powerless as if we were pushed
to and fro by forces far beyond our control. But there is a risk. The
political leaders, faced with street demonstrations, pander to the argument
rather than answer it. The demonstrators are right to say, ``There is
injustice, poverty, environmental degradation.''
But globalization is a fact, and, by and large, it is driven by people not just in finance, but in communication, in technology, increasingly in culture and recreation, in the world of the Internet, information technology, television. There's going to be globalization. And in trade, frankly, the problem is not there's too much of it. On the contrary, there's too little of it.
The issue is not how to stop
globalization; the issue is how we use the power of community to combine
globalization with justice. If globalization works only for the benefit of
the few, then it will fail and it will deserve to fail.
But if we follow the principles
that have served us here so well at home--that power, wealth and opportunity
must be in the hands of the many, not the few--if we make that our guiding
light for the global economy, then it will be a force for good and an
international movement we should take pride in leading.
Castro
part II - I agree - It is the hard reality:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/world/articles/castro_091101.htm.html
A lesson can be
drawn from that: none of the problems affecting today’s world can be
solved with the use of force, there is no global, technological or military
power that can guarantee total immunity against such acts, because they can
be organized by small groups, difficult to detect, and what is more
complicated, carried out by suicidal people.
Therefore, the
general effort of the international community must be to put an end to a
number of conflicts affecting the world, at least in this area. It is
indispensable to put an end to world terrorism (APPLAUSE) and build a
worldwide awareness against terrorism. It is not a country of bigots.
Here, it is not fanaticism that has been cultivated but ideas, convictions
and principles.
I reiterate that
none of the world problems –not even terrorism-- can be solved with the
use of force, and every act of force, every imprudent action that entails
the use of force anywhere would seriously aggravate the world problems.
The United States
is the country most vulnerable to terrorism.
It is the country with the most planes, with the greatest dependence on
technical resources, electrical power grids, gas pipelines, and so on. Many
of the people in these groups are fascists who do not mind killing. Mentally
speaking, they must be closer to insanity than to a balanced intelligence.
We have told the U.S. authorities that these methods should not be
publicized, because they are easy to use and a danger for them.
The way is neither
the use of force nor the war. intelligent policy based on the strength of
consensus and the support of the international public opinion that such a
predicament could definitely be solved. I think this unexpected episode must
be used to undertake an international struggle against terrorism. However,
this international struggle against terrorism cannot succeed by killing a
terrorist here and another one there, that is, by using similar methods to
theirs, sacrificing innocent lives. It
is resolved, inter alia, by putting an end to State terrorism and other
repulsive crimes (APPLAUSE), by putting an end to genocide and by honestly
pursuing a policy of peace and respect for unavoidable moral and legal
standards. The world cannot be saved unless a path of international peace
and cooperation is pursued.
A must read
In a world of absolute truth, in matters graver than life and death, there is no room for dissent and no room for theological doubt. Hence the reliance on literal interpretations of texts -- because interpretation can lead to error, and error can lead to damnation. Hence also the ancient Catholic insistence on absolute church authority. Without infallibility, there can be no guarantee of truth. Without such a guarantee, confusion can lead to hell.
The Terrorist Attack on America: Background
http://www.wiredbrain.net/defense.htm
http://www.wiredbrain.net/bioterrorism.htm
http://www.wiredbrain.net/microbes.htm
http://www.wiredbrain.net/whatisnext.htm
http://www.wiredbrain.net/war.htm
http://www.foreignaffairs.org/home/terrorism.asp
Foreign Affairs is making available previously published articles that contribute to an understanding of the tragic attacks on New York and Washington. Several of the essays analyze the nature of contemporary terrorism and the capabilities of the United States to combat it. Other essays provide the Middle Eastern and radical Islamic contexts for so much recent terrorism, including, apparently, the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
If the
government seems confused it is because they are:
1:) Michael A. Wermuth, a
policy analyst at the RAND Corporation and executive director of the Gilmore
Commission, which advises Congress on the nation's ability to respond to
terrorism, said that in a December 2000 report, the commission had
recommended that government officials draft a coherent plan for
communicating with the public after a terrorist attack.
Joseph Waeckerle, Chairman, Task Force of Health Care & Emergency Services Professional on Preparedness for Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Incidents, American College of Emergency Physicians
2.) Dr. Jonathan B. Tucker, a bioterrorism expert in the Washington office of the Monterey Institute for International Studies. "There is a real need for a communication strategy."
|
Return to the United States Domestic Preparedness Program page. Center for Nonproliferation
Studies - http://cns.miis.edu |
http://www.cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/domestic.htm
3.) http://www.foreignaffairs.org/home/terrorism.asp
Who did it? Foreign Report presents an alternative view
Israel’s
military intelligence service, Aman, suspects that Iraq is the state that
sponsored the suicide attacks on the New York Trade Center and the Pentagon
in Washington. Directing the mission, Aman officers believe, were two of the
world’s foremost terrorist masterminds: the Lebanese Imad Mughniyeh, head
of the special overseas operations for Hizbullah, and the Egyptian Dr Ayman
Al Zawahiri, senior member of Al-Qaeda and possible successor of the ailing
Osama Bin Laden.
Foreign Affairs is making available previously published articles that contribute to an understanding of the tragic attacks on New York and Washington. Several of the essays analyze the nature of contemporary terrorism and the capabilities of the United States to combat it. Other essays provide the Middle Eastern and radical Islamic contexts for so much recent terrorism, including, apparently, the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
If the government seems confused it is because they are:
4.)
In the present environment, many would agree that more license must be
granted to those responsible for our nation's security. Equally important
however, is the need to maintain the civil liberties which make America
unique among nations. In a recent article from the Cato Institute, http://www.cato.org/current/terrorism/pubs/eland-010920.html,
the author reminds us of the importance of denying terrorists the victory
that altering American society would represent. In an editorial by ACU's
David Keene, http://www.conservative.org/columnists/keene09202001.htm,
we are reminded that this alteration is the true motivation driving acts of
terror, and being thoughtful about how we proceed is an act of defiance in
itself.
http://www.heritage.org/views/2001/ed091601.html
5.) By contrast, a bipartisan panel on national security headed by former senators Warren B. Rudman (R-N.H.) and Gary Hart (D-Colo.) recommended in January the creation of a new independent agency to plan, coordinate and integrate federal homeland security activities.
http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/commission.html
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/ladin.htm
6.)
The Department of Health
and Human Services' Strategic Plan, the Attorney General's Five-Year Plan,
the establishment of a military Joint Task Force for Civil Support, and
improvement in first responders' capabilities are valuable efforts, but
there is still more to do.
http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol5no4/kortepeter.htm
Amy
Smithson, Senior Associate, The Henry L. Stimson Center; http://www.stimson.org/cwc/csmoped.htm
Joseph
Waeckerle, Chairman, Task Force of Health Care & Emergency Services
Professional on Preparedness for Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Incidents,
American College of Emergency Physicians;
Ron
Peterson, CEO, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, on behalf of the American
Hospital Association;
Frank
Young, former head of the Office of Emergency Preparedness, HHS;
Scott
Lillibridge, Special Assistant for Bioterrorism, HHS;
Bruce
Baughman, Director, Planning & Readiness, FEMA;
Jan
Heinrich, Director, Health Care & Public Health Issues, GAO. Washington,
DC
What needs to be done?
Let
me be as clear as possible about what needs to be done now, at once, today
-(by executive order under emergency powers with congressional
approval to follow) to protect the American population from a “Hiroshima”
size catastrophe. This has to be
the first priority.
If 9/11 was
not enough to get our attention – 6,000 dead, a trillion dollars in damage
– (including the economic, travel, employment, extra costs etc) then what
will? If we can’t do what needs
to be done now at least we should have the plans in place ready to go the next
time.
Open
discussion on a cease-fire – under the cover of the need for crisis
assistance.
A real
National Security Department: with a national and international supreme
commander (The Secretary of State – Powell)
Combine all
national and international capacities to counter terrorism – International
center with spies, electronic, observer systems, remote sensors, hit teams,
made up of people who know what they are doing. The police (FBI) and
intelligence community (CIA) and DOD special units must be put under unified
command including EU and others with a clear focus on prevention. A meeting of
principles should happen today – it is a grand alliance such as the NATO
Supreme Command structure of military warfare with a supreme commander - who
can draft whatever resources needed, make battlefield commissions, and apply
military discipline. Their job is to reduce the power of terrorist
organizations.
Make Homeland
defense (Gov. Ridge or the Sect. of Homeland Defense) one temporary super
agency with wide emergency powers to include FEMA, Coast Guard, border
security, INS, DOD, HHS and the other 40 agencies reporting directly with
flexible budgets to move resources quickly. The three functions – target
protection including populations from bioterrorism and facilities from attack,
money controls, and control of people’s travels (national ID cards) as well
as response, should be separate from the law enforcement or intelligence
function – the first makes risk assessment the other makes plans to defend
and respond. If we need the FBI, DOD, National Guard, and other agencies the
part that is target protection is broken off from their prevention functions. Their
job is to make it difficult to attack and respond when they do,
"Confusion
reigns at the lowest and the highest) levels," said Mohammad Akhter,
executive director of the American Public Health Association, who watched with
growing unease last week as a single anthrax-tainted letter pushed the
Washington area's emergency response system to the limit. He added, "This
is the one thing that causes us to shake in our boots."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A31008-2001Oct21.html
http://www.wiredbrain.net/terror.htm
http://www.wiredbrain.net/bioterrorism.htm
http://www.wiredbrain.net/defense.htm
War with Terrorism:
Walden believes the air war is serving another, less direct purpose. The fact that it is highly visible - "a fireworks display" - serves as a warning to other states that might be harboring terrorists. The ex-minister imagines the likes of Bashar al-Assad in Damascus and Muammar Gadafy in Tripoli summoning their intelligence chiefs, demanding to know if they have been giving aid or shelter to their own Bin Ladens and, if they have, to rub them out. They will be acting not from an altruistic desire to fight terrorism, but to save their own skin: they do not want the US air force pounding their military bases. A similar dynamic may even be at work in Afghanistan itself, as a Taliban regime, desperate to stop the bombing, arranges for Bin Laden to be quietly murdered, Mafia-style, in his bed. In other words, the air war may prompt the Muslim world to do the kind of "housecleaning" the west needs, but cannot do.
Still, the very fact that this debate is under way reveals the fundamental conundrum military strategists have faced since September 11. Their armies - with all their planes, tanks and ships - are designed for fighting other armies, attached to states. Yet the new enemy does not wear a uniform and belongs to no state; it lives in 60 countries and its troops are civilians who can use Stanley knives to bring a superpower to its knees. Surely to confront this enemy with B52s and Cruise missiles is as ludicrous as sending cavalry horses in to defeat tanks?
That's what Martin van Creveld has been saying for more than a decade. A Dutch-born military historian at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, he has lectured at army colleges around the world, warning of this seismic shift in warfare. "They listened to my lectures and they would always say, 'What an interesting idea' - and then do nothing." Now they are listening. His 1991 book, Transformation of War, is the set text of the hour.
He also wants to see a serious, draconian regime of UN inspectors with the power to find and root out weapons of mass destruction wherever they are. Countries would have to reveal any biological or chemical weapons - or face the full, armed wrath of the international community. More widely, there has to be a new regulation of "global space" - the realm of the internet, banking system and satellite technology - which Paddy Ashdown says has become " as lawless as Afghanistan". Like many, he wants the US to drop its go-it-alone stance and work with others. To fight what is a global threat, the world's nations are going to have to act globally.
Above all, they agree, the conditions which breed terrorism will have to be transformed. Revealingly, it is the former general who rattles off the list: "Poverty, disease, unfairness, lack of democracy..." Those who have food, security and prospects will not want to kill or be killed, he says. The US will have to demand Israel ends its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza but the Arab and Muslim world will have to change, too. Too many of those states are "rubbishy, crummy" places, Walden says, which have thwarted their own peoples for too long. Plesch believes the west could help by weaning itself off oil, using renewable energies instead, so breaking its dependency on the region.
Besides, the killers who boarded those planes on September 11, like the senders of those Anthraxgrams, were not in Afghanistan at all. What military action can be taken against the likes of them? Dan Plesch, the highly rated analyst at the Royal United Services Institute, can envisage a revival of "covert operations", the stealth, rule-bending activities that were once the stock-in-trade of US intelligence. He quotes the military official who told him: "This new war is not Rambo, it's The Godfather."
An air offensive on a distant country is not going to defeat a language student in Hamburg with suicidal dreams of hijacking a passenger jet. All that could stop him would be a Corleone-style execution. But Plesch treads warily in such terrain, recalling the CIA's grim covert record in Latin America: "We have to know what we're getting into here." Others share his concern, fearful that a policy of assassination only "turns back to infect the society which allows it".
What is to be done?
You can not go after an infection
with surgery.
First, I have to believe the Government from the
President on down is doing their best, as they know the best to do. Many
people are critics the government until they find they are dependent on the
collective community to provide for their safety and welfare. May God bless
our leaders, grant them wisdom and nerve, they need all the support and help
they can get.
But the sense of danger and emergency seems greater in
the public than in some of the administration doing business as usual. The
following suggestions are actions, which will improve our domestic security,
the first priority of Government, because without order there is no other
freedom.
First freedom from fear is the first freedom, then
freedom from overwhelming misery and want that blinds people to higher goals
and reduces life to the law of the jungle, then freedom from ignorance,
superstition, and false knowledge that drives people into evil, destructive,
and prevents needed confidence and progress, the forth freedom is civil
society, the room to disagree without being disagreeable, to promote diversity
without chaos, the room to experiment and innovate. But they come in that
order; so without security it is hard to provide the framework for basic
economic progress, without basic living standards, basic education is
impossible, and without a basic education civil society is impossible.
Thus, all effort should be directed to security and
the first line of defense is offence. There is no way of “target
hardening” or borders, or ID, or police work that will make us secure. The
War on Drugs is a close example and cannot defeat the importation of drugs.
The War on Terror even if 10 or 100 times the war on drugs and even if 10 or
100 times more repressive and nasty, dirty, and mean will not make us safe
here at home or our interests overseas.
Therefore, our domestic security depends on covert
intelligence and working on causes of misery, repression, ignorance, in those
parts of the world which provide the motivation, troops, and where with all to
attack us. Without a global vision there is no safety for the rich in a sea of
poverty.
1.) Assign every resource in the coalition to covert penetration, disruption, decimation, and assassination, of the enemy. A rapid response hit team from the G8 should be organized immediately and centered in the region. The Russians, Pakistanis, Jordan and the dictators of the CIS stans in the region, the Israeli, Egyptian, Saudi, Chinese, all have experience in kidnapping (including family members of the actors) bribes, threats, much better than we do. They are supported by electronic and visual intelligence, Special Forces and Air power, but the leadership is international, based on covert action not American traditional military. If you disrupt bank accounts you cannot use them to trace to the owners and who is getting the funds at the operational end. If you bomb camps you disperse the enemy rather than destroy them. You can not go after an infection with surgery.
2.) Internationalization of border security is done at the source more than at the frontier. The world has to get use to a high level of certification of people and cargo at the point of origins. Universal ID cards (passports) with biological ID need to be provided travelers, and secure manifests and seals for cargo. Oracle has volunteered to create such a system and we need it now – with tracks on travelers by recording the card at hotels, banks, auto rentals, airlines, and requiring all aliens to report via ATM machines (with bio scanners) on a regular basis.
3.) The great information system in the sky which can provide every traffic cop, border agent, visa officer, Airport, car rental or other contacts with a good real time lists of who we are looking for what ever their ID or false papers. Persons must be identified by their person not their documents. This system must be international, universal, and efficient.
Contrasts:
Basic elementary education, worldwide would be a
fraction of the U.S. Military budget – A billion students – at $100 each
– teaching salaries are under $1000.00, classrooms are primitive, books are
reused or shared. That could do more to make us secure in the new world than
seventy divisions. Includes a basic feeding program for 10 cents a day.
I have sat in a modern office building in a modern
University in a Southern City and looked across the street at “slave
quarters” – little wooden houses for domestic staff. We have the backward
areas in the Delta, in Appalachia, in Slums – England has Liverpool and
south London, Spain has extreme contrasts, but nothing like it was is in
Afghanistan, or Ethiopia, or of parts of the old Soviet Union, or China or
India or Pakistan, or North Africa, Egypt, South Africa – Modern
Universities, hospitals, engineering firms, communications along with tribal
areas without roads (tracks), water, or any modern technology, medicine, just
as a thousand years ago, or two thousand years ago or five thousand years ago.
As the world moves forward faster and faster, those
who stand still, or worse decline and get poorer because of ecological and
population pressures, are further and further behind. Some can leap frog –
jump from no phones to cell phones, but most are more and more dysfunctional
and uncompetitive, both in means and ideas. Ideas from a thousand years ago
were superstition, magic, tribal, irrational, but functional to their times
and needs. The clash of civilization is a clash of ideas – modern vs.
ancient. In Haiti, which has been in decline most of its history, and has a
population ecological disaster, it became clear as we prepared for an election
– a very modern idea –that voting was based on tribal customs and the
power of Voodoo and village tom-tom macude, loyalties were based on clans and
old land owning and business elites, politics included magic and witchcraft,
there were few newspapers because people can’t read, independent radio was
new and just beginning to have an impact, but the media was often in French, a
foreign language to the 90 % who know only dialects,
there has been no renaissance, no age of enlightenment, no industrial
revolution, no liberal middle class, no sense of a neutral bureaucracy or a
constitutional army, so sense of modern law and procedures, but just an
election imposed from outsiders.
Basic elementary education, worldwide would be a fraction of the U.S. Military budget – A billion students – at $100 each – teaching salaries are under $1000.00, classrooms are primitive, books are reused or shared. That could do more to make us secure in the new world than seventy divisions.
Selling Modern Islam:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/nation/specials/attacked/A40171-2001Oct10.html
Positive and negative feedback of Globalizations:
National Interest and international interests cannot be separated
Interdependence
Economic – growth -
Inequality, half under $3 a day, a billion under $1
Information -
New tools good and bad
Medical:
Better and new plagues
Democracy
Truth, Life and diversity – one or many
Tuesday,
October 09, 2001
Watch
Address
by Fmr. Pres. Bill Clinton
Sponsored by the Greater Washington Society of Association Executives.
Topic: Leadership & National & International Issues. Washington,
DC
http://www.c-span.org/terrorism/about.asp
Continued on http://www.wiredbrain.net/whatisnext.htm
One of the most likely target is the Capitol - the most likely means chemical / biological the Post reported -- raising the possibility that more such ``closed cells'' of militants may be operating undetected in the country.
I think we are hoping the Taliban will fall from internal and external opposition. We will be patient because we are threatened no matter how much bravado in speech, Bush, Powell and others are known for being cautious. Very dangerous and difficult but unlike in the past the leaders have their act together and know they have real dangers to face, together.
Part of the problem in the past under Carter, Reagan and Clinton was the proper mix of realism and idealism. Realism requires down and dirty - idealism requires a clear vision of a new world order - globalization that envisions a better world, more just, more humane, where environment, opportunity, fair trade, and other universal values are important. You have to have a positive idea to fight a nasty one. There has to be a clear international purpose for the global fight for order - not just fear and practical materialism. We have to win the war of ideas so we need some really strong ones on our side. Tony Blair has it right. We are interdependent and require a community of peoples, in our countries and between countries, races, religions, politics, and between the rich and poor. Wretch ness in Africa, in Afghanistan, in many parts of the world will not allow the rest of us to live in peace and comfort as if they don't exist.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8418-2001Oct4.html
One official said there was a ``100 percent chance'' of an attack should the United States strike Afghanistan (news - web sites), which has repeatedly rejected U.S. demands to hand over bin Laden -- the man Washington blames for the Sept. 11 hijack attacks on New York and Washington.
One senior official said some of the new information is ''very real,'' but also cautioned that some may be braggadocio or intentional disinformation designed to discourage the United States from retaliating, the Post said.
The United States has been massing military forces in the Gulf region and has warned Afghanistan it faces possible strikes if bin Laden is not turned over.
The new information comes from sources in England, Germany, Afghanistan and Pakistan, and officials believe Egyptian, Somali and Pakistani elements of bin Laden's al Qaeda extremist network may be involved, the newspaper said.
Members of Congressional intelligence committees declined to comment on the briefings, which are classified. But the Post reported that officials at the White House, the Justice Department (news - web sites) and State Department have been discussing the best way to convey the new concern to the public.
Attorney General John Ashcroft (news - web sites) said on Sunday the government foresaw ``substantial risks'' of further attacks on the United States after the Sept. 11 strikes on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (news - web sites), which left more than 5,700 people reported dead or missing.
'YOU CAN JUST ABOUT BET ON IT'
The FBI has found no links between any of the 19 alleged hijackers involved in the Sept. 11 attacks or their possible accomplices and any of the 1,000 to 2,000 suspected extremist sympathizers in the United States, including known al Qaeda supporters, the Post reported -- raising the possibility that more such ``closed cells'' of militants may be operating undetected in the country.
To head off any future attacks, the FBI has plans to go ''full tilt'' for 72 hours whenever the United States makes a move against bin Laden, al Qaeda, or Afghanistan's ruling Taliban, the Post reported, citing a senior law enforcement official.
Contrasts:
Basic elementary education, worldwide
would be a fraction of the U.S. Military budget – A billion students – at
$100 each – teaching salaries are under $1000.00, classrooms are primitive,
books are reused or shared. That could do more to make us secure in the new
world than seventy divisions. Includes a basic feeding program for 10 cents a
day.
I have sat in a modern office building
in a modern University in a Southern City and looked across the street at
“slave quarters” – little wooden houses for domestic staff. We have the
backward areas in the Delta, in Appalachia, in Slums – England has Liverpool
and south London, Spain has extreme contrasts, but nothing like it was is in
Afghanistan, or Ethiopia, or of parts of the old Soviet Union, or China or
India or Pakistan, or North Africa, Egypt, South Africa – Modern
Universities, hospitals, engineering firms, communications along with tribal
areas without roads (tracks), water, or any modern technology, medicine, just
as a thousand years ago, or two thousand years ago or five thousand years ago.
As the world moves forward faster and
faster, those who stand still, or worse decline and get poorer because of
ecological and population pressures, are further and further behind. Some can
leap frog – jump from no phones to cell phones, but most are more and more
dysfunctional and uncompetitive, both in means and ideas. Ideas from a
thousand years ago were superstition, magic, tribal, irrational, but
functional to their times and needs. The clash of civilization is a clash of
ideas – modern vs. ancient. In Haiti, which has been in decline most of its
history, and has a population ecological disaster, it became clear as we
prepared for an election – a very modern idea –that voting was based on
tribal customs and the power of Voodoo and village tom-tom macude, loyalties
were based on clans and old land owning and business elites, politics included
magic and witchcraft, there were few newspapers because people can’t read,
independent radio was new and just beginning to have an impact, but the media
was often in French, a foreign language to the 90 % who know only dialects,
there has been no renaissance, no age of enlightenment, no industrial
revolution, no liberal middle class, no sense of a neutral bureaucracy or a
constitutional army, so sense of modern law and procedures, but just an
election imposed from outsiders.
Basic elementary education, worldwide would be a fraction of the U.S. Military budget – A billion students – at $100 each – teaching salaries are under $1000.00, classrooms are primitive, books are reused or shared. That could do more to make us secure in the new world than seventy divisions.
The big squeeze:
There is light at the end of the tunnel of terror.
Never has so much power been allied against so few and weak targets. The
capture of Panamanian dictator Gen. Manuel Antonio Noriega was done with
overwhelming force. The Gulf war was a buildup of great forces against a third
rank power. The Powell Doctrine
of overwhelming force seems to be applied again in the attack on Afghanistan.
The doctrine is based on the idea that strong and short is better than long
and painful – learned from Vietnam with escalated step by step – if we had
put 500,000 troops in at the start of 1965, made a deal and were out in 1967
– the outcome would have been different.
The new alliance with Russia (which changes the basic
geo-political dynamics) means a great deal of new power brought to the
pressure on the Taliban. It is a
criminal case and public procurers use squeeze techniques on those connected
with the primary target. They
threaten maximum penalties unless the associates cooperate. A bunch of cops
and lawyers can bring in RICO laws, technical infractions, and throw the book
at the suspect (and in some cultures torture, pain and suffering) while
offering rewards or bribes for cooperation, including witness protection,
reduced or dropped charges, even using friends, family or other hostages. It
can get really tough and mean.
In international crime there is a military and
diplomatic equivalent to squeezing a suspect or associate of a principle
target. Ben Laden is
the target, a big reward on his head, and lesser rewards for his associates,
wanted dead or alive, the Taliban are the associates and the subject of the
big power play. From Pakistan, from Russia, from Iran, from the central Asian
republics, from Arab fundamentalist, from various ethic and tribal forces
(that cross international borders) even from international aid agencies,
offer threats, bribes in sacks of gold to bandits, and while building up a
clear threat of physical punishment.
So we can apply Powell’s rules – overwhelming force, quick action, clear way out with something called victory. Overthrow the Taliban, a coalition government under the old king, clear out the training camps and take Afghanistan away from the terrorist organizations. If they go elsewhere the message is clear such as Somaliland – we will not allow it, the government will be taken out and the base destroyed. A scattered underground organization is much more difficult to manage and less dangerous.
Blowback:
An eye for and eye –
The unspoken agenda of national consciousness is
tied up in the idea of “blowback”. Now
we must change our foreign and military policies to make us safer here at home
but don’t want to say so because first of all we are perfect and they are
evil and they just hate us for our goodness.
To change under pressure (is there any other
way?) may make it looks like they have made us do it (no matter how sensible
in any case) and therefore have won by making us a better country and more
responsible member of the international community. So far, they have scored a
great victory and we have suffered a great defeat. We can and will recover but
so far they are winning. It might be a good idea to make changes long overdue.
When asked if our police work and foreign operations may increase the danger
of retaliation and therefore increase rather than decrease our national
dangers and insecurity, people don’t know what to say or do.
You can’t just forget it and run a war of words
and a phony war forever but real retribution increases the likelihood of a
event even more terrible than Sept 11th here at home and most
likely in the Nations Capitol. The very decision makers are under the gun –
the goal of the enemy is economic and political destabilization – the
targets are money and power – where is the lynch pin of American money and
power – the stock market and the world trade center, the federal reserve,
the congress and Whitehouse, the TV networks, the power grid, the
communications system not football games or population centers.
Civilian casualties do cause blowback even on terrorist.
Most generals, politicians, diplomats, reporters
are facing a great dilemma. We all are faced with a quandary within an enigma,
problems within a puzzle inside a riddle in a predicament that is a
international charade of great intricacy, a labyrinth, a maze, with great
COMPLEXITY (as Churchill described the Kremlin) and with no safe or simple
answers. In other words tough choices and we have a C grade leader, with a
number of grade A+ advisors.
Saudi Arabia is one of the least democratic
nations and anyone in opposition can be labeled either a dangerous terrorist
or a reformer since there are few avenues for legitimate dissent.
Israel is our biggest problem making enemies in the billions with democratic leadership using terrorist methods in maintaining an illegal occupation of those lands conquered from others because their God told them to. (In the same way Andy Jackson and the US took native lands and then use methods of genocide and ethic cleaning against native peoples in the great removal, or the same in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Latin America, where White Christians took lands and destroyed aboriginal populations. The American Army even used germ warfare, by giving Indians blankets infected with small pox, among other horrors. We even have blowback from the crusades, the British Empire, and of course the cold war, where no nation was too evil or corrupt if they were on our side. )
Bin Laden, they knew, has prided himself on maintaining a low profile. For the past decade, his mysterious ways have nourished the psychological threat he poses to the West. It has also kept him out of harm’s way.
The experts could not figure out what prompted his personal friend, Mullah
Mohammed Omar, supreme leader of the Taleban government to offer him the post.
Both men go back a long time, to the mid-1980s, when they used to pray
together in the Karachi mosque.
It wasn’t Bin Laden’s only surprise. DEBKAfile’s
terrorism experts believe that story was made of whole cloth and planted as a
piece of misdirection
After a few thousand years of being bandits (on the silk road from Europe to China) they have learned the art of hit and run - and misinformation,
My theory is he is Lebanon or Marbella, Spain or other places that rich Arabs go to private clinics - for treatment of his kidney problems. jaundice, hepatitis, cirrhosis, cystitis, nephritis, kidney failure a common problem in tribal Afghanistan He has several doubles that appear here and there to drive the cops crazy and look stupid.
http://www.kirtland.cc.mi.us/honors/possums.htm
Blowback
Blowback
(bloąbŕk´) noun
1.
The backpressure in an internal-combustion engine or a boiler.
2.
Powder residue that is released upon automatic ejection of a spent
cartridge or shell from a firearm.
But
more than that; blowback is the long-term effects on our homeland security
from foreign operations now and in the past. There are three major causes of
Blowback in the current effort to provide protection of the American homeland.
More
than the arming of the terrorist in the war against the Soviet Union in
Afghanistan, in Vietnam against
Japan, in Central America against “communist”, our freedom fighters of the
past become the terrorist of today.
If
we agree that the goal is to have fewer enemies and more allies. Do we need to
carry on a old fight with Iran? Do we need useless sanctions and air cover on
Iraq? Do we need to support illegal settlements in Palestinian territory that
become flashpoints to bring down the safety of our homeland? Do we need bases
in Arabia that look to protect absolute monarchs and their cronies?
Running with the Hyenas:
The current orthodox executive dogma is to be fast, smart, flexible using small-decentralized units who are empowered to act on their own. Our Government and especially law enforcement and the intelligence community and the military is tied in knots of regulations, chains of command, paper empires, overlapping and conflicting missions, employing some smart people but have many who can’t see to the end of the hall or beyond their next paycheck. The current agencies are the IBM, G.M., ATTs, of the past. They are from the hierarchal World War II, cold war organization written huge and dysfunctional in the age of information. Failure is okay in communist style monopolies or public agencies since there are no objective outcomes that really count and waste and inefficiency is normal but error is punished. In old organizations people are motivation to do nothing new or different and never think for themselves. The agencies are there because they are there and serve some special interest or group.
One model of the modern organization is the SAS, the special air services who were designed to operate behind enemy lines, be creative, since they were really are on their own. The American military bureaucracy has always hated Special Forces because they are out of the chain of command. When Col. North wanted ill regular forces he set up a unit reporting to the NSC outside the pentagon. The officers in charge worked on hand written notes which allowed them to command aircraft, supplies, cash as needed. A hired gun can become a loose cannon but real security, speed and flexibility could not be maintained by cutting orders in the hierarchy.
Now we are dealing with clever deceptions of a highly devout dispersed organization. According to Qatar-based satellite TV station Al-Jazeera, they have captured one of the teams sent in to scout for the brother in Islam, Osama Bin Muhammad Bin Laden. It was bound to happen. Meanwhile their base is safely out of sight, dispersed over the planet, and the Special Forces are in a nest of vipers.
What
does it take to run with Hyenas? What does it take to find and destroy nests
of vipers? No one knows much in the current case, Israel perhaps, some
foreign intelligence services, the Russians, but it will require small
flexible smart operations, it requires decentralized leadership,
multi-national forces, and some very nasty methods – assassinations,
poisons, deep cover spies, bribes, black-mail (anthrax means black carbuncle, malignant pustule - sent in the mail), turning their agents into
counter-agents, "Intelligence is nothing if not an institutionalized
black market in perishable commodities" (John le Carré).
Criminals and spies have the same goals and methods. They are out to
lie, (cover up who they are and pretend to be who they are not), cheat, (get
the trust of people you are out to harm) and steal (secrets and
information). It is our good
fortune that we are not very good at Espionage.
Having
independent units with a license to kill is very unnerving.
Benefit Cost Analysis:
The attack on America is the bloodiest single day in
American History. It will cost several trillion dollar. There is up to 1/4
trillion in direct destruction which is not the major problem, another trillion is
direct costs to air travel, tourism, insurance, and related businesses is much
more important. A
trillion or more was lost in commercial assets (stock market losses), which
take several points out of GDP and deepens the recession already underway.
In this way the attack has weakened the nation at its economic core.
In past law enforcement campaigns, The Alien Acts approved by Congress empower President Adams to order any alien from the country and imprison any alien in time of war. The acts force French aliens to flee the country at a time when war looms with France, Thomas Jefferson opposes the legislation and drafts Kentucky Resolutions that declare acts of Congress "void and of no force" when Congress "assumes undelegated powers," the governor of Kentucky approves
Jefferson's resolutions November 16, James Madison drafts similar resolutions, and the governor of Virginia approves
them,
the red scare of
the 20’s, anti-communist in the 50’s, espionage, the drug laws, RICO
anti-mob laws, have made serious inroads into freedom and liberty. The last war fought on American soil, the Civil War,
Lincoln suspended the constitution, the right of being charged or released,
and ruled by decree, and he used wide emergency powers including the use of
military courts and justice to union as well as southern citizens.
He surrounded the Congress with troops and sent the Supreme Court home.
The current government is not so extreme, yet, but moving in that
direction, while claiming its belief in the constitution they mean to rewrite
the 4th amendment (search and seizure), the 6th the
right to due process, as they have in the past. It just is not possible to
increase security within all the rights, liberties and freedoms we want. This
is another cost, which cannot be avoided.
Protecting borders, increasing control on visa
holders, I.D., passes, inspections, checks et al is another cost.
The first rule of the dismal science, economics, is
the use of resources, if you do more of one thing you do less of something
else – opportunity costs are the cost of things not done – so like the act
of contrition – we regret what we have done, commission and what we have
left undone, omissions. We spent trillions defending our nation from the
“evil empire” while our schools got worse, our infrastructure rotted, our
cities decayed, and it may not been the optimum use of scarce resources. The
billions now going into anti-terrorist activities, when we don’t really have
any good ideas or national strategy may not be the best use of our national
energies.
The enemies have shown a real capacity to strike at
places and times of their choice. No system of security is 100% or even 50%.
These costs of the next could be much greater, 10 times even 100 times greater.
Before we go out and DO SOMETHING we have to stop and think. What can we do
that will help and have a high benefit cost ratio. BIG Military action may
have the lowest benefits and the highest costs.
Action with more benefits than costs:
Make more friends and have fewer enemies
Force a solution on Israel and Palestine
Get organized as a government -
Improve international cooperation – money, chemical, biological, small arms, and arrangements
Improve human intelligence – and if we can’t do spy stuff we need to work or hire those who can
Reduce unnecessary military activities – bureaucracy, last war stuff and troops around the world
Avoid using American resources to prop up corrupt and repressive regimes against their own people (such as in Iran and now in Saudi Arabia) excused during the Cold War as anti-communist but made us lots of enemies and still does.
Asymmetrical Warfare: hit and run
We have been used to going around the world and throwing our weight around. The gunboat diplomacy was based on Inequality: difference of quantity or degree with one of SUPERIORITY, one of INFERIORITY. There is no real defense as long as the causes continue to exist. The method was successful during the Rebellion of the
American Colonies or we call the American revolution - in Vietnam - and against the Russians in Afghanistan.
Therefore, the weaker party uses methods that are irregularity, variable, and unpredictable, changeable, never the same, sporadic, FITFUL inconstant, inconsistent, fickle, mercurial, And CAPRICIOUS so we can’t predict what they will do next.
The enemy is Temperamental, EXCITABLE patchy, UNEQUAL random, haphazard, irregular, unsystematic or
asymmetrical. Their methods are AMORPHOUS untidy, unkempt, disheveled, out of order, ORDERLESS uneven, off plumb, bumpy, lumpy, choppy, jerky, ROUGH erratic, out of step, out of sync, out of time, gaining, losing contrasting, contrasted, CONTRARY heterogeneous, various, diverse, DIFFERENT, DISSIMILAR multifarious,
miscellaneous. They use techniques of many kinds, of all sorts, MULTIFORM multicolored, divergent, diversified, DEVIATING dissenting, DISAGREEING aberrant, atypical, UNCONFORMABLE exceptional, unusual, unconventional, ABNORMAL unique, lone, SPECIAL individual, handmade
tools and weapons and are out of uniform.
We have to defend against great variability, patchiness, NONUNIFORMITY Unevenness, ROUGHNESS disproportion, asymmetry, DISTORTION, DISAGREEMENT oddness, skew ness, lopsidedness, OBLIQUITY disparity, DIFFERENCE unlikeness, DISSIMILARITY disequilibria, unstable equilibrium, imbalance, unbalance dizziness, the staggers tilting of the scales,
using temporary preponderance, by means of hit and run.
They are Underweight, short weight, LIGHTNESS defect, shortcoming, inadequacy, INSUFFICIENCY
but fix the Odds, by being DIFFERENCE makeweight, counterpoise, OFFSET bonus, partiality, discrimination, BIAS, INJUSTICE
and all kinds of dirty tricks.
Abstract relations: Not uniformity therefore, cannot be directly
defended by planned defense but only by fast smart and flexible teams.
My fellow Americans:
We are engaged in a serious campaign against
serious enemies that are out to weaken us as a nation.
The threat to our nation is real and serious. Our response must be also
serious and real. The assurance of security is the first responsibility of
the federal government and without security there cannot be the type of
freedom, prosperity and creativity basic to our very existence as a nation.
Yes, indeed, the future of the republic is endangered. We must respond
accordingly. We are challenged to over come traditional special interests, bureaucratic
traditions, and as the Secretary of Defense has said the inability of old
systems to respond to new threats is a fundamental danger to our national
security.
Our security was designed in World War II and
adjusted to defend us from the Soviet Union. We have a department of defense
and other agencies organized and equipped to deter Atomic attack, a massive
land war in Europe, protect our interests and allies in Asia, and maintain
domination of the open oceans. Our intelligence community, designed to focus
on Soviet Military threats, cannot protect us from the dangers that now exist.
We need a new organization, a National Security Department – we have gone
from the War Department to the Defense department now we need the National
Security Department, NSD. The new dangers require new thinking, new people,
new talent and creativity such as the Space Program in the 1960’s. If we
fail to rethink we may fail to survive.
The NSD will not have units based on 18th
and 19th century military thinking, an Army, Navy, Air Force but on
21st century threats and technology. The core functions are:
1.)
National
Intelligence Agency, (the CIA,
NSA and dozens of other elements of the community) for technical and human
intelligence using methods that work, our first and most important security
service in the New World Order.
2.)
National
Special operations Agency, Quick strikes forces – Special Forces, rangers,
seals, SAS, by land, sea and air – international arrangements must be our
first line of defense and response to enemy groups when they can be located.
3.)
War
fighting systems –War fighters Command structure (by regions or threats) http://www.wiredbrain.net/defense.htm
the big forces by Land Sea, air, and space based high tech weapons against
real dangers when they exist. We must develop a rational research, development
and procurement system.
4.)
Homeland
security Agency domestic foreign agents and counter-intelligence, FEMA, chemical and
biological threats, borders security, coast guard, customs, INS, and other controls on the movements of
people, goods, and money – the national ID system – making it harder for
our enemies to operate and being prepared if they succeed.
Domestic law enforcement – the FBI, DEA, ATF, and domestic police refocused and
organized to provide domestic security from real dangers.
We cannot have all the old programs and create
new systems at the same time – we have to reduce Cold War structures, bases,
and equipment to pay for new means and methods. We must cut down on the number
of federal crimes, returning the enforcement to the states and local
communities. We must focus on the important federal function and reduce less
critical activities.
We must restructure and focus our national
government, which as built up over the centuries. There are seven-core
functions:
1.) Natural Resources, (Interior, Agriculture,
Energy)
2.) Human Resources (Health, Education, Labor,
Social Security and Welfare)
3.) Treasury (commerce, trade, transportation,
HUD)
4.) State Foreign Affairs (could include INS),
5.) National
Security Department,
6.) Justice
Congress must follow this reorganization and
simplification and cut out pork and special interest log rolling (at least for
a time)
Every function that can be decentralized to regional capitals should be decentralized to Chicago, Dallas, San Francisco, Boston, Atlanta, Denver and the regions, states and inter-state organizations.
Phony War:
The haunting writings urge the hijackers to crave death and "be optimistic." At the same time, the document starkly addresses fear on the eve of their suicide mission.
"Everybody hates death, fears death," according to a translation of highlights of the document obtained by The Washington Post. "But only those, the believers who know the life after death and the reward after death, would be the ones who will be seeking death."
This appears in a section of the document beneath the words, "The last night."
That section begins, "Remind yourself that in this night you will face many challenges. But you have to face them and understand it 100 percent. . . . Obey God, his messenger, and don't fight among yourself where you become weak, and stand fast, God will stand with those who stood fast."
The practice of discipline in making disciples in a secret organization go back to the beginning of human civilization. For the most part Sufi "path" is spiritual and humane.
http://www.arches.uga.edu/~godlas/Sufism.html
There is a military form which developed under the Ottomans empire (in Turkey and Egypt) Janissaries, elite corps of warrior shock troops. The methods involve direct experience with death - to overcome the fear of death and complete attachment to the practice and its leaders. Shambhala warrior training comes from the region - and connects to a whole world of martial arts. http://www.shambhala.org/
In these ways, the terrorists and their sponsors are different from our conventional foes. The communists, our enemies for so long, were not all that different from us in an important regard. Their pitch to the noncommunist world was not that they would make it less free and more constrained by custom -- the aim of Islamic extremists -- but that they "ostensibly shared ultimate goals of freedom, equality and prosperity."
That quotation is from a 1993 article in Foreign Affairs magazine by Samuel P. Huntington of Harvard University. It was titled "The Clash of Civilizations?" and it created such a stir that Huntington was invited to the State Department to brief the planning staff. It also was widely criticized as overly broad and too stridently written. Essentially, it foresaw a clash -- or clashes -- between the Christian West and much of the rest of the world, in particular Islam.
I concur in some of the criticism, and yet a rereading of the article shows that much of it has held up. Huntington noted that many of the most active participants in fundamentalist movements "are young, college-educated, middle-class technicians, professionals and business persons." That certainly fits what we have learned about the 19 terrorists who died in the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center. They were not the suicide bombers of Israel -- poor, urban and undereducated. The hijackers had been to colleges or technical schools and were sufficiently Western to meld into American society.
Huntington observed that the more contacts these extremists have with Western culture, the more it "invigorates differences and animosities" that "stretch back deep into history." To the cultural fanatic, familiarity -- Western music, clothes and reverence for the individual -- breeds a seething contempt that is indistinguishable from madness.
And yet, there is enough in the Huntington article to explain why U.S. strategists talk of a long war. Huntington and Osama bin Laden are in agreement on one point: Whatever happens to bin Laden or, for that matter, the Taliban, the cultural roots of this conflict will persist. When bin Laden says, as he has, that even if he is eliminated others will come forward, this madman is merely restating what a foremost academic has put in more conventional language.
We can hope the international community will help the Americans take the attack on America as a major criminal act by a global criminal conspiracy rather than an open war. The reason for restrain is because we are NOT safe from even worse attacks and will end up with a cycle of violence, retribution, and play into the hands of the enemy by destabilizing western civilization. Second, there are no good conventional military targets and Afghanistan is a tar baby or brier patch with no good options only ones that are less bad.
There are lots of police and covert actions that will weaken the terrorist, remove their bases, disrupt communications and improve perpetration and intelligence without a big bang. There are many target hardening and security measures that need to be in place before there is overt military action. We must have our defenses in place before we attack.
You often hear the pulse of the country from taxi drivers and barbers.
The woman who's been cutting my hair for more than 20 years, who's an avid
watcher of television news, asked me yesterday, "Are we going to be safe?"
I wish I could know the answer. This was after her questions about
suitcase-sized nuclear devices and biological agents. Those of us in the
news business may be better informed than the average citizen, but I can't
begin to know how safe we'll be.
In the present environment, many would agree that more license must be granted to those responsible for our nation's security. Equally important however, is the need to maintain the civil liberties which make America unique among nations. In a recent article from the Cato Institute,
http://www.cato.org/current/terrorism/pubs/eland-010920.html, the author reminds us of the importance of denying terrorists the victory that altering American society would represent. In an editorial by ACU's David Keene,
http://www.conservative.org/columnists/keene09202001.htm, we are reminded that this alteration is the true motivation driving acts of terror, and being thoughtful about how we proceed is an act of defiance in itself.
Subject: NIGHTLINE: Could They Strike Again?
>
> There's no doubt that the events of September 11th left a searing
> impression on much of the world. If the United States had been thought to
> be prepared for a major terrorist attack, the awful news that morning
> forced people here and abroad to reassess how protected Americans are from
> the kind of terrorism we've witnessed in other parts of the world. Just
> this morning, the finance ministers of the G7 industrial nations vowed to
> "leave no stone unturned in the fight against terrorism." There's no
> shortage of resolve, but how much do we know about the coordinated
> campaign of terror that has been a wake-up call for all of us?
>
> Flight schools, cropdusters, trucks with hazardous cargo and fake i.d.
> cards have been the staple of recent stories on the investigation. It
> appears clear that some of the September 11 hijackers were able to operate
> in this country without detection or even suspicion. Now what law
> enforcement wants to know is who else may be lurking in our midst, who has
> similar intentions, and what do we do about it?
>
> Another reminder that the whirlwind of news coverage has produced a
> cottage industry of rumors and information that demands closer scrutiny.
> If there are stories you'd like us to check out, please e-mail us at
> niteline@abc.com and be sure to use the word "FACTCHECK" in the subject
> line.
>
An important feature of this complicated landscape is a broad chasm between the way Americans see themselves and the way they are seen.
GLASS in the water - more dangerous than sharks
Counter-insurgency experts have long recognized that to be operationally effective extremist organizations need the support, or at least acquiescence, of a wider community of people who don't necessarily share all their aims. Mao Zedong, the 20th century's most successful exponent of what is now fashionably termed "asymmetrical warfare", understood this dynamic very well: "The people are water, the Red Army are fish; without water the fish will die."
It's closer to the type of complexity in controlling international drugs than [it is to] Desert Storm," said retired Gen. Barry McCaffrey, who led the 24th Mechanized Infantry Division against Iraqi forces in the Persian Gulf War a decade ago and later headed the Office of National Drug Control Policy under President Bill Clinton. "It requires an interagency effort by the Defense, Justice and State [departments]."
Oh dear ! Is the War on Terrorism another "war on drugs" which has been a failure - It not a happy picture of the "war on terror" going the same way with even greater risk of failure. Why? Would catching 10 % of the weapons coming into the US be useful ? Is finding 5 % of the money? If after 30 years the trade is just as big and bad as it was with no hope in sight of getting any better?
WHY is the War on Drugs a looser?
http://www.bigbrother.net/~mugwump/osamabinladen/
But the INS and the FBI were not the only agencies to fail in their duty to protect America.
The three concentric circles of American security failed: the Central Intelligence Agency's foreign intelligence; the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Immigration and Naturalization Service's domestic security, and the Federal Aviation Administration's airport security.
The roots of this calamity lie in institutional sclerosis and bureaucratic ossification. Congressionally-mandated blue ribbon task forces failed to see it coming.
Musa Abu Marzook, one of Hamas' top three officials, was permitted to found and operate a think tank in Chicago and Virginia, and Ali Mohammed and Adih el Hage, a top Al Qaida lieutenant and secretary to Bin Laden, were also allowed into United States.
In addition, senior leaders of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Egyptian Jihad, Tunisian and Algerian radical Islamic organizations, and leaders and spokespersons for the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, which calls for attacks on American targets and for suicide bombings, as well as for Jihad against Jews and "other enemies of Islam" were allowed to receive green cards or U.S. citizenship, according to congressional testimony.
A Few Loyal Men Direct Bin Laden's Sprawling Network
Osama bin Laden, the fugitive Saudi millionaire accused by the Bush administration of masterminding a global jihad, or holy war, against the United States. The father of the bride was his longtime aide, Mohammed Atef, a former Egyptian policeman described by terrorism experts as military commander of the terrorist network al Qaeda.
The guest of honor was a physician, Ayman Zawahiri, leader of the Egyptian Islamic Jihad organization, which has claimed responsibility for a series of terrorist attacks in Egypt. Three years ago, Zawahiri formally merged his group with al Qaeda, creating a movement that called itself the World Islamic Front for Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders.
According to U.S. officials and counterterrorism experts, Zawahiri and Atef are bin Laden's most important lieutenants, the ideological and military brains behind an escalating wave of terrorist attacks targeted primarily at the United States. Their hallmarks -- breathtaking audacity and meticulous planning -- appear consistent with the methods displayed by the organizers of the latest attacks.
At least one and possibly several organizational layers separate the tight circle around bin Laden and the men who hijacked the aircraft on Sept. 11, according to a variety of experts who have analyzed past cases in which bin Laden's network has been described.
Continued on http://www.wiredbrain.net/whatisnext.htm
|
For information about reprinting this article, go to http://www.lats.com/rights/register.htm
In response to war "Hawks" (there are no high ranking doves) Powell made clear his critical role in the chain of command and the importance of the international alliance - the NSC, The President, State, DOD, Treasury, Justice (in that order) had made decisions and would not allow confusion about who spoke for national policy. He said the focus remains on bin Laden and his al Qaeda network. Many people here and abroad are very comfortable with Powell and that he will not do something stupid that will make things worse. His response is that Phase I is in place and other issues will be dealt with latter, not now, so get in line, in response to the far right hawks.
Some in the administration, most notably Deputy Defense Secretary Paul D. Wolfowitz, and Sen. Helms pressed for action against Iraq. Powell countered that this could "wreck" the international coalition now backing a firm U.S. response to the Sept. 11 attacks.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13819-2001Sep23.html
The remarks by Powell and other administration officials were part of an effort to portray a calm, methodical response to the terrorist assaults, buying time for the administration from an American public craving revenge. "The campaign has begun," Powell promised in remarks to two television networks yesterday, echoed by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and national security adviser Condoleezza Rice.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13984-2001Sep23.htmlCounter-insurgency experts have long recognized that to be operationally effective extremist organizations need the support, or at least acquiescence, of a wider community of people who don't necessarily share all their aims. Mao Zedong, the 20th century's most successful exponent of what is now fashionably termed "asymmetrical warfare", understood this dynamic very well: "The people are water, the Red Army are fish; without water the fish will die."
Well, we spent trillions on MAD (mutual assured destruction), which was very unlikely but so terrible we
felt we had to match their bombs and missiles with our bombs and missiles even to first strike capacity. NOW the unthinkable is a real “holy war” fought in the streets of Dallas, LA, Boston, and Chicago with biological and chemical weapons, causing 100,000’s of causalities, the failure of our infrastructure: power, communications, transportation, and even the civic order and the state itself.
The Moslem Brotherhood, operating as a super secret league of small independent organizations only multiplies with every effort to destroy them. Like the war on drugs it becomes a cancer, which metastasize and spread into many of various malignant neoplasm characterized by the proliferation of anaplastic cells that tend to invade surrounding tissue and to new body sites. The pathological condition characterized by such growths becomes a pernicious, spreading evil: A cancer of hate, fear, want, and bigotry spread through the community.
As far as Afghanistan is concerned, the history of madaris (religious schools) and taliban (religious students) is as old as the arrival of Islam in that country. Both religious schools and taliban existed long before the modern system of schools and education was introduced there almost a century ago.
Since the establishment of Islam in Afghanistan, the taliban, a sort of religious proletariat, have been recognized as an inseparable part of the social fabric. In addition to running religious schools, mosques, shrines and all kinds of religious affairs, they have distinguished themselves as mujahideen (holy warriors) whenever the cause of Islam or, for that matter, the cause of Afghanistan as a Muslim country, was at stake. Thus, in the context of Afghan history, the Taliban are not an upstart movement. The international community, however, perceives them differently and seems to be confused by the Taliban phenomenon.
Saeed Ahmed Minhas
http://www.sangat.org/review/islam/minhas.html
CIA superspooks admit that their posse of white Mormons from Utah never learned Pashto or Tajik, Afghanistan's two principal languages.
http://frontierpost.com.pk/articles.asp?id=3&date1=9/27/2001
If there is an end of the American Century it would be would be ugly and painful – the basic cause is not the strength of the enemy but our own inability to change the way we think and act. All great empires and big companies fall of their own weight not from the strength of the barbarians at the gates. That is why we need to think the unthinkable: regional governments would be more stable than a centralized state, making enemies into friends or at least neutral - Cuba, Iran, Palestine, Syria, Libya, - yes, changes under threat – that is a common practice, the fear of death wonderfully concentrates the mind.
Looking for the middle way in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and elsewhere – not repressive military dictators or violent revolutionaries but the middle ground. What we support at home we should do overseas. While America is a conservative middle class land, we act as a right wing bully overseas – the Alliance for Progress, Human Rights concerns, have tried to moderate our extreme foreign policy.
How does this happen – a moderate country does immoderate behavior overseas. The power of special interests, oil, corporations, military, corrupt politics there over flows into campaign contribution, high prices lobbyist, and public relations firms in Washington for the Butchers of Haiti, murderers in Latin America, bandits in Africa, Ben Laden in the fight against the Russians, Marcos and the Shah who stole billions used to corrupt politicians, support for evil has been a staple of American Policy. There is almost no foreign news reported in the US, almost no interest or knowledge of foreign lands and policies, so into this vacuum comes the special interests, which knows the American Government as the best money can buy. It does not have to be either Batiste or Castro – but that takes intelligence, interest, attention, and the true reflection of American Values overseas.
Is it our fault people hate us? Is it our fault we are attacked? Yes, it is because we have allowed this anti-American foreign policy to go on for decades. If we acted better would we be safer. Yes, indeed, a lot safer. If we act has we have been acting will it get worse? Yes, a whole lot worse until the country is destabilized and weaken. Would being nice, friendly, and helpful everywhere all the time solve the problem – no way – but dividing into regional governments – ten allied federal sovereign states of 30 million would not behave in the same way as one of 300 million.
A severe CHOICE:
The
elements of stagecraft:
The elements of stagecraft:
(As used in world war II but forgotten in the bureaucratic mess of state oversight)
The enemy is set up as many independent cells run by coordinators (handlers) who are independent of each other but connect to the next level by invisible leadership up the next circle or ring. There are separate and independent specialist in separate cells performing functions in transportation, equipment, weapons, money, papers and identifications including cover and false papers, communications who operate with the rule “there is no there, there”, or double blind where neither side in an transaction knows or needs to know who the other is.
There
are cover companies in international trade, banking, aircraft, auto rental,
travel agencies, communications, news organizations, agricultural
and construction (for a supply of explosives) and many other industries.
Someone lets an actor know to go someplace and pick up something – the
assassinations of Kennedy and Martin Luther King were done this way – the
assassins did not know whom he was dealing with but was at the end of a chain
of double blinds. (A research methodology where neither the agent, doctor for
example, or the patient knows if they have the drug or a placebo to prevent
prejudice)
The President laid out a bleak choice,
either live in terror or carry on a long war against terror everywhere
for a long time.
“But this country will define our
times, not be defined by them. As long as the United States of America
is determined and strong, this will not be an age of terror. This will
be an age of liberty here and across the world.
Great harm has been done to us. We
have suffered great loss. And in our grief and anger, we have found our
mission and our moment. Freedom and fear are at war. The advance of human
freedom, the great achievement of our time and the great hope of every
time, now depend on us.
Our nation, this generation, will
lift the dark threat of violence from our people and our future. We will
rally the world to this cause by our efforts, by our courage. We will not
tire. We will not falter and we will not fail. “
Psychological warfare – tactical and strategic propaganda
“Every nation in every region now
has a decision to make. Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.
From this day forward, any nation
that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United
States as a hostile regime.
Our
nation has been put on notice: We're not immune from attack.
We will take defensive measures against
terrorism to protect Americans. Today dozens of federal departments and
agencies as well as state and local governments have responsibilities affecting
homeland security. These efforts must be coordinated at the highest level.
So tonight I announce the creation
of a cabinet-level position reporting directly to me, the Office of Homeland
Security
“These terrorists kill not merely
to end lives but to disrupt and end a way of life. With every atrocity
they hope that America grows fearful, retreating from the world and forsaking
our friends. They stand against us because we stand in their way…they are
the heirs of all the murderous ideologies of the 20th century. By sacrificing
human life to serve their radical visions, by abandoning every value except
the will to power, they follow in the path of fascism, Nazism and totalitarianism.
And they will follow that path all the way to where it ends: in history's
unmarked grave of discarded lies.
Americans are asking, "How will we
fight and win this war?"
We will direct every resource at our command — every means of diplomacy, every tool of intelligence, every instrument of law enforcement, every financial influence and every necessary weapon of war — to the disruption and to the defeat of the global terror network.
These measures are essential. The
only way to defeat terrorism as a threat to our way of life is to stop
it, eliminate it and destroy it where it grows.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/21/national/21BTEX.html?pagewanted=2
I will not forget the wound to our country and those who inflicted it. I will not yield. I will not rest. I will not relent in waging this struggle for freedom and security for the American people.
The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain. Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war. And we know that God is not neutral between them.
Fellow citizens, we'll meet violence
with patient justice, assured of the rightness of our cause and confident
of the victories to come. In all that lies before us, may God grant us
wisdom and may he watch over the United States of America. Thank you."
The choice of Ridge, a moderate Republican and Vietnam War veteran, addresses a problem highlighted by several recent government commissions and studies that found the United States seriously vulnerable to a terrorist attack and unable to properly coordinate law enforcement, intelligence, civil defense and emergency rescue operations.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A1708-2001Sep21.html
By contrast, a bipartisan panel on national security headed by former senators Warren B. Rudman (R-N.H.) and Gary Hart (D-Colo.) recommended in January the creation of a new independent agency to plan, coordinate and integrate federal homeland security activities.
Rep. William M. "Mac" Thornberry (R-Tex.), a member of the House Armed Services Committee and author of a bill to establish a homeland security agency, called Bush's move "an important first step." He added: "The key thing now is to make sure it has a budget and authority and resources to get the job done."
"I'm encouraged by it," added Sen.
Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.), who has called for the creation of a separate
new homeland defense agency. "I take Bush's statement as an endorsement
of the idea, although the new office will have to be more than just someone
in the White House. It must be someone with line authority and a budget
to go with it."
Currently, the more than 40 federal agencies that have some role in combating domestic or international terrorism consume more than $11 billion a year.
Bin-Ladin's investments include companies involved in property management, maritime transport, aircraft rental, public works, contracting and other commercial activities in a number of countries. His investments in Sudan include construction and agricultural projects, with other commercial activities in Somalia, Switzerland, and Luxembourg. His European interests are managed by lawyers in Switzerland, which makes his financial dealings and support to terrorism difficult, but not impossible, to follow.
http://www.fas.org/irp/world/para/ladin.htm
Mistakes
of the past:
We were not prepared
for Pearl Harbor. Let us learn rather than repeat history.
The
fight against terrorism is very difficult, dangerous, and quite different
from the past. It requires a New World Order, including security arrangements
in international trade (certification of goods and services) and people
ID and visas, banking, travel, arms control, biological and chemical weapons
control, refugees, economic development, governmental reorganization, new
forms of information, new types of intelligence, new forms of military
organization and equipment, with the threat of real war – not the old style
of radical behavior by small groups to call attention to causes or force
political change. These old groups claimed their acts for publicity purposes.
The new groups are complete
secret and deny their acts and have classical military aims of controlling
territory, overthrowing governments, and destroying their enemies. Bin
Laden’s Al Qaeda coalition
and the Taleban are one and the same. The targets of their aggression include
the region of Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Iran, the Middle East
and south Asia, with the attack on America is secondary. They believe America
is the prime support for their enemies and needs to be weakened then driven
out of the region. Indeed this is a new Nazi threat by stealth rather than
blitzkrieg to establish a new world order different from what the West
had in mind.
Targets:
Afghanistan, Syria and Syrian controlled Lebanon, Libya, Sudan, part of the Philippines, Columbia, Peru, the Balkans, Palestine, Kashmir, the trans Caucasus and Samarkand, UZBEKISTAN, on the Trans-Caspian and the Chechnya region and elsewhere.
Much of the world resents us, and the resentment on the rise.The result of the terror attacks and maybe the response to the attack will likely destabilize the whole region. It is fundamental to the structural nature of the world economy and demographics.The base causes are inequality and unequal distribution of power. U.S. foreign policy must be more compassionate, more humble, less arrogance – we need to make more friends, have fewer enemies but this will not free the world of enemies of the modern world.
Current news:
http://nt.excite.com/ntd.dcg?UID=A61BAC843351654C;page=show;topic=Homeland+defense
http://nt.excite.com/ntd.dcg?UID=A61BAC843351654C;page=show;topic=Osama+bin+Laden
Intelligence – new ways
to infiltrate, disrupt and break up dangerous groups
Prevention – Target
Harding, customs, USDA, coast guard, (DOT) INS, border control, security
-
Emergency Response –National
Homeland defense agency – civilian built on FEMA
Retribution – new forms
of police and military
Iran:
With strong Western
CIA backing, monarchist elements ousted the nationalist Mussadegh in 1953.
In the 1960s the shah initiated a modernization program that was designed
to improve economic and social conditions, but which brought social and
political unrest. The regime, supported by the U.S., became increasingly
repressive, and in 1979 popular opposition forced the shah to leave. The
CIA and diplomacy completely missed understanding of social forces in the
country.
Ayatollah Ruhollah KHOMEINI,
an Shiite leader exiled since 1964, returned and established an Islamic
republic. Hundreds of the shah's supporters were tried and executed, others
fled the country, and the westernization of Iran was reversed. On Nov.
4, 1979, Iranian militants seized the U.S. embassy in Teheran, held the
occupants hostage, and demanded the return of the shah from the U.S. After
the shah's death (1980) in Egypt, an agreement was negotiated that freed
the hostages on Jan. 20, 1981. Meanwhile, a full-scale border war with
Iraq erupted in Sept. 1980 (see IRAN-IRAQ WAR), severely reducing Iran's
oil production and disrupting its economy. The government was also beset
by internal violence and unrest among ethnic minorities. The war ended
with a cease-fire in 1988. In 1989, Khomeini died and was replaced as supreme
religious leader by Iran's Pres. Ali Khamenei; Akbar Hashemi RAFSANJANI
became president. Rafsanjani diminished the influence of fundamentalist
and revolutionary factions and placed greater emphasis on economic development,
but continued economic deterioration revived the power of hard-line factions
associated with Ayatollah Khamenei.
The conditions in Saudi
Arabia are not so different from Iran. In 1990 the kingdom joined the American
coalition that opposed Iraq's forcible annexation of Kuwait, and the forces
of the coalition were largely based in N Saudi. In 1992 King Fahd decreed
a new constitution; among its features were an appointed national council
(est. 1993) with the right to review, but not overrule, government acts,
but the royal family's power was basically undiminished.
The stability of Pakistan
as an independent Muslim state bordering India to the west and was in the
east, now Bangladesh, with her capital at Karachi and formed by Mohammed
Ali Jinnah, of the Muslim League as governor general. A dispute over control
of Kashmir is referred to the United Nations December 30 after millions
have died in bloody riots following partition. Since 1946 every form of
government in the state has failed. The people are a mixture of many ethnic
groups, with the Punjabis the most numerous; Pathan tribes in the northwest
and Baluchis in the west have pressed for autonomous states. Islam is by
far the dominant religion. Urdu is the official language, but English and
Punjab, Pashto, Baluchi, and other ethnic languages are spoken.
Tajikistan:
We have Special Forces
in place getting used to the region.
Probably descended from
the inhabitants of ancient Sogdiana, a Persian province between the Amu
Darya and Syr Darya, the Tajiks were successful in farming, crafts, and
trade by the 9th cent. Between the 13th and 19th cent. they were ruled
by the Mongols, Uzbeks, and Russians. In the aftermath of the Russian Revolution
(1917), the Tajiks rebelled and were not subdued by the Bolsheviks until
1921. The territory became an autonomous republic in Soviet Uzbekistan
in 1924; in 1929 it became the Tadzhik SSR, a constituent republic of the
USSR. Tajikistan declared (1991) its independence following the failed
coup against Soviet Pres. Gorbachev. When the Tajik president sought to
suspend the Communist party, the Communist majority in the parliament replaced
him, which led pro-Islamic and pro-democratic opposition groups and their
eastern Tajikistan allies to try to bring down the new president, former
party boss Rakhman Nabiyev. In 1992 Nabiyev was ousted by opposition militias,
and an ethnically based civil war erupted. Forces allied with the former
Nabiyev government retook the capital and most of the country, and the
parliament elected Imamali Rakhmonov president. Fighting between government
troops, supported by the Russian army, and pro-Islamic forces persisted
along the Afghanistan border, but in 1994 a cease-fire was signed. Rakhmonov
won election as president in 1994; antigovernment forces did not participate
in the vote. Tajikistan is a member of the COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT
STATES.
Israel’s military
intelligence service, Aman, suspects that Iraq is the state that sponsored
the suicide attacks on the New York Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington.
Directing the mission, Aman officers believe, were two of the world’s foremost
terrorist masterminds: the Lebanese Imad Mughniyeh, head of the special
overseas operations for Hizbullah, and the Egyptian Dr Ayman Al Zawahiri,
senior member of Al-Qaeda and possible successor of the ailing Osama Bin
Laden.
![]()
Dr.
Peter E. Pflaum, GlobalVillages
http://www.wiredbrain.net/
As
in most political party lines there is more than a grain of truth but an
equal grain of error and manufactured propaganda.
The
enemy is indeed evil but we need to understand them not just call them
names. We are fundamentally innocent and benign, even humane as a people
but agencies and parts of our government and business have made enemies
around the world in our name. We have supported an occupation of Palestine,
harmed the people of Iraq and Iran, and supported various evil governments
from Haiti, Latin America, the Middle East and elsewhere, including Royal
Families in Arabia, Kuwait, and the Gulf States, not exactly part of the
modern world.
The
Nazi ideology and behavior was evil itself. BUT it was largely the outcome
of the mistakes following World War I, vengeance, reparations, inflation,
isolationism and appeasement. This does not justify Nazis but we have learned
our lesson about how to avoid setting the stage for more evil by acts of
short sighted self-interest, passions, greed, hate, and domestic political
advantage. After the next War we have made friends and allies of the enemy
of World War II. While Stalin
was as bad as Hitler he was the most valuable military force of the allied
powers against a common enemy. As
Churchill said we will make a deal with the devil in the fight for our survival.
The point is to be forward looking and smart not quick and stupid.
So it is not just an ill rational attack by evil but the extreme edge of much bigger issues that have to be addressed. There is no possible justification for the attack but that does not mean we can refuse to understand it. Understanding is not justification; we understand the murderer does not mean we support murder. There some things called fuzzy liberal thinking where the criminal is made out to be a victim and used to be soft on crime. Understanding the causes of crime does not mean you have to justify crime and can make us safer from criminals.
There are five aspects of law enforcement - and this was an international crime - not quite a "war"
1.) Detective work - reorganize CIA, FBI, DEA, ATF, Coast Guard, Customs, INS, NSA and 45 agencies- for international anti-terrorist police work
2.) Intelligence - spies - and real regional experts - who actually know something - languages - history
3.) Target Hardening - walls, bars, ID checks -
4.) Criminal Justice - trial or punishment - UN validation of military actions
5.) Causes - the goal of war is to reduce the number of enemies - the role of "smart" diplomacy is to make friends, naturalize others, and form alliances.
We need to force a settlement on Israel - Palestine - deal with Iran and limit our fight in Iran. Death and dying:
denial - We are just realizing we are all vulnerable, expugnable, in danger of, not immune, LIABLE open to, wide open, exposed, naked, bare, UNCOVERED unarmored, unfortified, undefended, unprotected, at the mercy of DEFENSELESS unshielded, shelterless, helpless, guideless unguarded, unescorted, unshepherded, unsupported, unflanked, isolated, out on a limb unwarned, off one's guard, UNEXPECTANT and we all need each other everywhere.
The stages go in progression through denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance
The crime was horrific. Never have so many
Americans died from violence on a single day. It felt and looked like war.
President Bush and Secretary of State Powell have call the crashes "acts
of war." But having four commercial airliners commandeered by political
fanatics is not war, it is international terrorism, albeit at its worst.
America and all nations concerned about peace, justice, and dignity will
need to respond. But the response should be deliberate, just, and humane.
In the past, the U.S. has responded to terrorist attacks with military
strikes that were misdirected, mistakenly targeted, and counterproductive.
The 1986 bombing raids on two Libyan cities, the bombing of a Baghdad neighborhood
in 1993 in response to rumors of a planned assassination attempt on former
President Bush, and most recently the air strike on a Sudanese pharmaceutical
plant mistakenly believed to be a chemical weapons factory associated with
Osama bin Laden are three cases that should remind us of the folly--and
terrorism--of vengeful retaliatory strikes.
http://www.ips-dc.org/911/johnletter.htm
http://www.tompaine.com/
http://www.tompaine.com/opinion/2001/09/16/index.html HE speaks as one who hates the Taliban and Osama bin Laden. There is no doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity in New York. I agree that something must be done about those monsters.
It is entirely possible that Bin Laden wants to repeat Saladin’s jihad with a war with US. He knew the dramatic and terrible acts of terror would cause a reaction, which he trusts will be reckless, thoughtless, arrogant, and foolish. There is a track record American incompetence when dealing with very complex social, religious, economic and political issues in foreign lands. The resulting chaos from military intervention could topple Pakistan, which could fall into the hands of the Taleban and Kashmir radicals. With Pakistan comes an atomic weapon. The whole of the region is destabilized and the war against Christian and modern godless civilization establishes a territorial and military presence. It is unlikely that anything now in planning will make America any safer and a clear and present danger of making it a whole lot worse. Removing Bin Laden will not diminish the threat I am afraid it could make it worse. We need to get our act together, our friends together, and think long a hard and talk to people who know something about the lay of the land.
So what do we do? Get our act together
Homeland defense – including some dramatic
governmental reorganization – put the FBI and DEA together – completely
modernize INS, vastly improve intelligence see http://www.wiredbrain.net/terror.htm
Make friends not enemies
International organization – small arms, biological, chemical, money laundering, drugs, Interpol, Europol, Asiapol, all of which we have thumbed our noses at under this administration.
Solve problems don’t make them – In war you want fewer enemies – not more
Impose a solution on the Israel Palestine issue
Makeup with Iran and reduce the pressure on Iraq
http://www.wiredbrain.net/defense.htm
As
the Terrorism study, below points out there is NO plan for HOMELAND defense.
No set of measures will make us secure in a divided world –
A
nation or globe divided against itself can not stand - a quarter rich and
three quarters poor - with one nation having half of all the military power
and NATO having 2/3 the economic power of the world - add in Japan and
one billion people out of six billion or 16% have 3/4 of the wealth – BUT:
http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/commission.html
The United States does not have a
single counterterrorism budget. Instead, counterterrorism programs exist
in the individual budgets of 45 departments and agencies of the Federal
Government. The National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure, and
Counterterrorism (currently a member of the President's staff) is responsible
for ensuring that the counterterrorism programs in these departments and
agencies meet the President's overall counterterrorism objectives.
Some
of the agencies have a part in homeland defense - and in order of the quick
fixes - this needs to be done now:
There are things that will slow them down. In law enforcement there are five activities - catching criminals who have already committed crimes is only one of the five:
1.) Chasing the bad guys – detective work
2.) Target hardening (walls, fences, gates, passes) sends them somewhere else
3.) Intelligence – undercover penetration of criminal organizations and street knowledge
4.) Working on causes -
5.)
Justice and corrections
Information
and coordination:
1.)1.)
NSA National security agency (DOD) and 2.) CIA – plus several military
intelligence units for 3.) Army, 4.) Navy and 5.) Air force needs to update
and coordinate their means and methods. I think the reasons CIA was independent
50 years ago are no longer important so it should be moved into DOD’s modern
war fighter unit. http://www.wiredbrain.net/defense.htm
2.)Homeland
defense is a DOD – Dept. of Defense responsibility – so they should be
in charge as the lead federal agency (LFA) overseas. Once people are in
the country law enforcement becomes important so Justice should be in charge.
The FBI and INS need to get their act together along with,
3.)Who
gets in? The 6.) State Dept., visa, (several units) 7.) Boarder patrol,
8.) Customs, 9.) ATF (in Treasury) 10.) INS (in Justice) and 11.) Agricultural
inspection and others from different departments need to guard the borders
- have the needed computer capacity to see who gets in and where they are
now. The 12.) FBI and INS need to develop systems of current registration
of visitors, aliens and students.
4.)Why
we have separate agencies for different laws is beyond me. It is as if
you call the police and they have to know the nature of the crime to know
who is sent – drugs, firearms, bank robbery, smuggling, money laundering,
all have different agencies for one set of criminals.
5.)What
gets in? The 13.) DEA has both border and intelligence functions as does
the 14.) Coast Guard (Dept. of Transport) – also MONEY tracking. 15.) Office
of Foreign Assets Control and the 16.) IRS (Several
more agencies in banking and currency)
6.)Disaster
planning: 17.) FEMA, 18.) Health services biological and 19.) DOE Atomic
20.) National Guard
7.)Airspace
–21.) FAA
8.)22.)
National security council,
Over the past few years, the U.S. Government has taken a number of
positive steps. Several Presidential Directives have effected major changes
in organizational responsibilities and improved cooperation. The Department
of Health and Human Services' Strategic Plan, the Attorney General's Five-Year
Plan, the establishment of a military Joint Task Force for Civil Support,
and improvement in first responders' capabilities are valuable efforts,
but there is still more to do.
There is a risk that, in preventing or responding to a catastrophic
terrorist attack, officials may hesitate or act improperly because they
do not fully understand their legal authority or because there are gaps
in that authority.
There is some statutory authority that does not now exist that should
be considered for catastrophic conditions. For example:
·Federal quarantine authority cannot be used in a situation that is confined to a single state.
·Not all cities or states have their own quarantine authority.
·There is no clear federal authority with regard to compelling vaccinations, or rationing scarce vaccinations, or requiring autopsies when necessary for a terrorism investigation.
The Constitution permits extraordinary measures in the face of extraordinary threats. To prevent or respond to catastrophic terrorism, law enforcement and public health officials have the authority to conduct investigations and implement measures that temporarily exceed measures applicable under non-emergency conditions. These may include cordoning off of areas, vehicle searches, certain medical measures, and sweep searches through areas believed to contain weapons or terrorists.
Surprise, when it happens to a government, is likely to be a complicated, diffuse, bureaucratic thing. It includes neglect of responsibility but also responsibility so poorly defined or so ambiguously delegated that action gets lost. It includes gaps in intelligence, but also intelligence that, like a string of pearls too precious to wear, is too sensitive to give to those who need it. It includes the alarm that fails to work, but also the alarm that has gone off so often it has been disconnected. It includes the unalert watchman, but also the one who knows he'll be chewed out by his superior if he gets higher authority out of bed. It includes the contingencies that occur to no one, but also those that everyone assumes somebody else is taking care of. It includes straightforward procrastination, but also decisions protracted by internal disagreement.
http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/commission.html
A national lock down:
Before we stir up a nest of hornets:
Everyone needs to be issued smart high tech identity
cards, one for citizens (help solve election registration problems), one
for foreign aliens and even for undocumented workers. No
one can move without the ID at hotels, car rental, cell phone registration,
banks and credit cards, driver permits and airports, as in many countries
around the world.
Registries of aliens must provide current address and activities on a real time basis. They have to report in on a regular basis. The whole INS, State Dept. border patrol needs to be updated and completely computerized. These files need to be internationalized and tied directly to Interpol.
If there are dozens of terrorist teams already in the country they have to be rounded up before we attack their base.
Like Glass in the water:
What do the terrorist want? They want to frighten us. Well, they have won I am frightened.
It must be apparent that they can retaliate. If
there are 50 teams in the states and maybe a thousand worldwide they are
glass in the water, less visible than sharks, with very dangerous plans
and the ability to execute. Biological, chemical, by air including private
planes, by sea, attacking mass populations and landmarks to get our attention
or the power grid, the communications networks, of our fragile technology
to weaken and punish us.
Are you ready to attack? Are you ready for the counter attack? Are we to live like Israel with permeate enemies? This seems to be the elephant in the living room no one wants to see. ( a poll shows that 85% of the public expect more attacks)
The American Military, which is configured
to fight the last war, is in many ways more of a liability than an asset. Large
bases are a target and need to be protected, sizable forces in Europe,
Japan, Korea and else where with tanks and cannon are draining resources
from mobility, flexibility, and having more bite than tail. DOD bureaucracy
is really a threat to national security as the Secretary said last week.
It stiffens innovation, slows everything down, and disables the ability
to respond in a timely and creative manner. We
need to assemble as quickly as possible a few 21st century brigades
of clever troops with smart weapons. http://www.wiredbrain.net/defense.htm
War with Terrorism:
Not just on but also with, means they will strike again at any time by means of their choice.
For this reason, Gouttierre is skeptical about talk of attacking bin Laden directly. For one thing, he says, “removing bin Laden from the scene would have no effect on the group ... It’s all designed so that if 10 people die, it’ll probably grow, not diminish.” Many of its members are overseas already—probably more than 50 left in the United States alone, he thinks, with hundreds or even thousands in other countries—and therefore self-directed. For another, such talk is simply “anthropomorphizing the threat” and missing the point that Al Qaeda is far more than one man. But doesn’t the group depend on his reported charisma? “The issues have made him charismatic,” says Gouttierre, “and we’ve made him charismatic. Even those who abhor what he does begrudgingly admire the way he frustrates the big power.”
http://www.msnbc.com/news/629240.asp#BODY
Terrorist organizations have been rolled up – but never completely eliminated. They evolve into something else.
To
make matters even more complicated, US officials now seem to be looking
into the possibility that this week's attacks may have been a co-operative
effort.
They
may well have in mind the role of Ramzi Yousef, regarded as the mastermind
of the last attack on the World Trade Center in New York, in 1993.
He is now in an American jail. Ramzi Yousef has links with Mr. Bin Laden and Afghanistan - but he may also have links with the Saddam Hussein government in Baghdad.
“ Mr.
Bin Laden's organization is very different from the groups that carried
out bombings and hijackings in the past.
It
is not tightly knit with a clear command structure. It is a loose coalition
of groups operating across continents.
American
officials believe Mr. Bin Laden's associates may operate in more than 40
countries - in Europe and North America, as well as in the Middle East
and Asia.
This
has two important consequences for investigators. One is that tracking
the people, the front organizations and the financial infrastructure of
this network, is an immensely complex task.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1544000/1544534.stm
He
has been described as a "venture capitalist" of Islamic extremism - running
"Jihad Inc" and its subsidiary "Jihad-Dot-Com".
A
group might come to him with a plan for which he might supply money - or
he might put one group in touch with another - or he might come up with
a plan of his own and find sub-contractors to carry it out. “
http://www.msnbc.com/news/629240.asp#BODY
Most
others are riven by internal conflicts or else have been heavily infiltrated.
Indeed, the group provides much of the military muscle now being deployed
by Afghanistan’s Taliban leaders in their ceaseless civil war against the
opposition forces in the northern part of the country.
But
to say that bin Laden is in some sense the sponsor of the attacks isn’t
to say he ordered them. “He probably didn’t know what was going to happen
on Tuesday,” says Gouttierre. “He’s clever. The organization is clever,
and the more decentralized the organization is, the more effective it can
be. If you don’t have communications streaming back to the center, you’re
less vulnerable to discovery.”
It’s
in the nature of a terrorist group organized into cells that one cell doesn’t
know much if anything about what other cells are doing. In the case of
Al Qaeda, it’s clear that while bin Laden arranges financing for the group,
sets out training methods and supplies an overall ideological framework,
the terrorists are often on their own once training is over and they’ve
been conveyed out of the camps in Afghanistan or Sudan. Gouttierre calls
this “guerilla terrorism” because of the high degree of operational freedom
the agents enjoy: “If you make the people involved not dependent on what
happens to anyone else, the risk of failure is diminished considerably.”
In
fact, he says, the system creates “a kind of friendly competition among
cells.” There is similarity among them, but that’s because “the objectives
are the same, the training is the same and therefore the methods are the
same.”
Not to frighten the public:Continued
on http://www.wiredbrain.net/whatisnext.htm
After the fact we find that operatives in the Attack
on America were trained in Afghanistan, stayed in known safe houses, including
the Brother of the chief suspect, applied and received American Visas under
their own names, registrar in schools, etc., WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
The way this and maybe other terrorist organizations
work means there are many other cells or teams out there.
Individuals are recruited or volunteer for training
in camps in Afghanistan, Syria and Syrian controlled Lebanon, Libya, Sudan,
part of the Philippines, Columbia, Peru, the Balkans, Palestine, Kashmir,
the trans Caucasus and Samarkand,
UZBEKISTAN, on the Trans-Caspian and the Chechnya region
and elsewhere. They learn
basic operations, military, close combat, security, spy craft, communications,
money supply, arms, explosives, etc. and are sent out to act on their own
in cells or teams. The teams that attacked America were working on the
plan for years. The attack on the warship and the embassies in Africa were
there for years. This means there is an inventory of cells still out there
with widely different plans and schemes.
There is a connection to militant Islam but not
completely limited to a holy war. The groups in Latin America and Ireland
have interconnection, have bombed and assassinated and may have increased
their capacity to run international operations. We have a dirty war going
on the Columbia and Peru, which may spill over.
The willingness to die flying a civilian aircraft with passengers into a skyscraper to kill thousands means they are willing to use atomic, biological or chemical weapons. The current attack was years in the planning. What operations are now planned, where and how?
There is not likely to be any connection between operations – one does not lead to others. They are independent and unconnected. The core seems to be Saudi, Egyptian and other Arab states. Do we have to check every resident from those states?
After the fact we find that operatives in the Attach
on America were trained in Afghanistan, stayed in known safe houses, including
the Brother of the chief suspect, applied and received American Visas under
their own names, registrar in schools, etc., WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?
|
http://search.freefind.com/find.html?id=6148074&pageid=r&mode=ALL&query=wiredbrain+pflaump
which are not limited in content therefore is nonlinear and not fixed in time or space - Synergy Group can signin to 100's of web sites using "wiredbrain" password "synergy" pflaupflaupflaupflaump@cfl.rr.com active group members.
Now no nation can assure it’s own security.
Economic Shock: Now no nation
can assure it’s own security.
Major economic sectors such as market trading,
insurance, air travel, oil prices, hotels and resorts, consumer confidence,
are all hit – about – 3 % hit on GDP (300 billion)-
increased spending on reconstruction, military, security will add +1 %
(100 billion) but not all at once – a rather long delay in getting money
spent– so next quarter should go to – 3% and –2% for the first quarter
of 2002 – a loss of 500 billion to the economy and 100 billion to the government
– so given the extra costs, the surplus is GONE and given the surplus was
based on +3% growth, public finance may go into actual deficit!
So? The ability of the Americans to do anything
depends on domestic peace and stability. Our resources are not unlimited
and need to be used carefully.
A real community of nations dealing with:
1.)Criminal investigation and intelligence (reopen arms trade and money launderings agreements)
2.)Military intervention – including international anti-terrorist forces with local knowledge
3.)Working on causes of poverty, inequality, political instability and corruption
This means stronger NATO, UN and other international
organizations – a turn abound for the Bush administration – inclusion of
China, Russia, Pakistan, the Arab League in the actual alliance.
The issue of terror may last for generations and
has no quick or easy answer. The strengthening of the global community
could be a positive outcome. The American States were forced to unite in
the 1780’s because of lawlessness and the inability of the separate states
to provide guarantees of civic order.Now
no nation can assure it’s own security.
Synergy Logo for default.htm
our
current working page - today's comments on the synergy
Journal
www.multicrawl.com for synergy site: use wiredbrain and "any topic"
Key word "infrastructure" http://www.wiredbrain.net/information.htm
The new
tech search
on hot companies
http://www.spaceports.com/~sparkg/wavs/pinky/battle.wav
http://www.spaceports.com/~sparkg/
http://www.zdnet.com/ferret/images/ferret3.gif
Ferret finds 1500 Wiredbrain "pflaump" web pages
Individual development, organizational change, and In the computer industry, power comes not from the barrel of a gun but from the interface of a

Our unconditional support for Israel,
(and anti-Castro groups) our commitment to military solutions to political
problems, (bay of pigs approach, Vietnam etc.) our weak central leadership,
and cooperative mass media means that what would help neutralize the “holy
war” in the Middle East are very difficult politically while revenge, punishment,
efforts to destroy targeted groups, is enormously popular and will do little
good and most likely is harmful – counter-productive as it always has been
in the middle east. We need to make friends, have fewer enemies, lower
our profile, promote development, democracy, work with allies, turn former
enemies into allies, and infiltrate the core of terrorist groups.
In the history of the world the American
Empire is one of the most benign. We have bases and the big footprint of
international corporations around the world and the more contact we have
with the world the more people do not like us. We appear and often are
crude, arrogant, uninformed, provisional, greedy, pushy, the ugly American
image and fact around the globe.
But we have no territorial ambitions, few actual colonies, and are a pluralistic democracy. The Cuban, Jewish, military-industrial, and corporate lobbies, which can have an undue influence and act as a veto group on reform.
From dust to dust:
Welcome to the neighborhoods:
The police have primary internal security responsibilities, although paramilitary forces, such as the Rangers and the Frontier Constabulary, provide support in areas where law and order problems are acute, like Karachi and the frontier areas. Provincial governments control the police and the paramilitary forces when they are assisting in law and order operations. In August the Government announced a devolution plan that included some increase in local political control of the police; however, the Government had not implemented this plan by year's end. During some religious holidays, the regular army is deployed in sensitive areas to help maintain public order. After the coup, the army played a role in enforcing exit control restrictions at airports and border crossings, reportedly as part of the Musharraf regime's anticorruption accountability campaign. Members of the security forces committed numerous serious human rights abuses.
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2000/sa/index.cfm?docid=710
One hundred thousand years ago (more or less) in one population in Africa, part of the brain, which had been used for other animal senses such as vision and smell, was used as uncommitted cortex to develop speech and abstract thinking. This ability is best called the catch-on factor. It enabled these modern people to envision things that have not happened, to plan activities not yet done, to go beyond the seen to the unseen, to go beyond the known to the unknown, and learn for others what is possible.
http://www.wiredbrain.net/documents/pathos/story.txt
Each generation spread over the globe
at a days walk and in tens of thousands of years occupied most of the planet. The
tribes created complex cultures and tools and abilities such as building
boats and tombs but were not yet literate or civilized. About
10,000 years ago in caves and then monasteries in the Hindu Kirsch civilization
began with symbolic language and a vision of leadership. The central idea
is “being in the world but not of the world” a basic abstraction of life
from culture. We all are the creation
of culture in the way we think and believe. The cultural model
of the world is a set of perceptions, beliefs, habits, customs, institutions,
totem and taboos deep set in consciousness and reinforced by rewards and
punishments. Leaders can not defy the paradigms of their times but must
have a wider vision. They are in the culture but not of it. They have to
pretend to believe in the common ideology but also transcend it. The
role of priest king is an difficult act (it would be and is very dangerous
to believe in your own divinity) but more than sincere pretence – it is
the ability to be many things to many people while keeping a core of reality
beyond the common perception of what is real or possible.
http://www.wiredbrain.net/documents/pathos/pathosum.txt
In
any case civilization was built on the Sufi training received and passed
on from Ur to Egypt to Alexander by teachers in woolen robes. John the
Baptist was such a teacher from the wilderness. Sheik (Lord or Master)
Jesus, Ben Joseph el Nazareth of the house of David was a teacher of another
faith with a new idea. The people could not separate themselves from themselves
because it is too hard, and civilization needs the people to believe in
the values of the common culture, but there was another more real and beautiful
place after this life in the next world.The
resurrection of the body as well as the transformation of the spirit made
for a community of saints by faith alone.
The Sufi masons who created the modern
world from the Majorcan to Newton and Jefferson, knew the divine rights
of Church and State was a big pretense made necessary for the civil order.
They had the faith of enlightenment and a vision that a secular community
of saints could establish a novus ordo seclorum using the annuit coeptis
(look on the back of your dollar bill) of the ancient wisdom by the civic
elite while maintaining the common faith of the people with new institutions
and process including public education. Leaders need to humble themselves
in the face of GOD, deist in the face of nature and natural law. Natural
reason and law would replace the need for blind faith in ancient superstitions.
http://www.wiredbrain.net/documents/pathos/wilson.txt
And
pathos01.txt to pathosum.txt
Now many of the people have lost their common faith and their leaders have no real Sufi training or vision. Even most Sufis have become mystics and a cult. And out of the Hindu Kirsch comes a devil that rejects the modern world and is out to destroy it. The ancient question still needs an answer – how do you have civic order, faith in greater good and higher authority, while promoting enlighten free thought and tolerance. The American religious fanatics, the Jewish settlers in Israel and part of the Catholic Church also reject the modern world’s values and call on the authorities of God to (themselves) reestablish a cultural discipline against the sinful way of the world, even to saying the death and destruction is from the wrath of God. Anyone who thinks they speak for God is guilty of the greatest heresy (including the Pope) and moral pride and is very dangerous because such pride has no limits.
I don’t know -
http://www.wiredbrain.net/documents/pathos/sufi01.txt
You must not confuse those who have made a business
of right wing politics with religion, nor Rush Limbaugh with thought and
analysis, nor other commercial speech. The same can sometimes be said for
professional money raiser on the right - environmental, etc., The first
rule of honesty is to not take fees for ideas -
http://www.wiredbrain.net/documents/pathos/fees.txt
http://www.wiredbrain.net/ pfpfpfpflaump@cfl.rr.comp>RE: Fees for Practice:
Sufi is not other worldly but promotes success in this
world. The wisdom gained in becoming a complete human and
the charisma and power released will give force to any and all
activity. (The force be with you) There is magic in "the focus"
of a free, spontaneous, intuitive mind and spirit in complete
union and beyond self. All the waste of self doubt, insecurity,
social habits, internal battles, fears of feeling and the terror
of freedom is released and every day is a peak experience and we
all become Mallow's Self-actualized transcendental person.
There
is a method to educate people in this way. The simple process is
to release psychic energy that is bottled up. The process
involves music, sounds and tones (Om-Mani-Padme-Hum- Sssuuuf and
movement, bio-energies, wake-up, focus attention, Ti Ch'i, Zen,
visualizations and meditations, all of which raise awareness and
energize the mind and body with the life force.
In the long and honored history of Sufi Schools and guides
(Teachers) there are only two rules or principles of
instruction. The first is that "evil" (practically the only
mention of evil in the literature) comes from the belief
that your ideas are reality. Sin comes from Ideology, the
worship of idols, false prophets and blind faith in bad
leaders. (People are worse than beasts, stones, or storms - which
are natural - man can fight, pretend, and ignore nature and their
inter-selves- for long enough to do real harm. )
Reality exists outside the person or culture (A priori) and has
clear existence outside our thoughts, feeling, or beliefs. Human
attitudes are based on an experience of Illusions, we only see
shadows and social conventions. -
When we really begin to experience directly reality - it is our
relationship with that external existence that give knowledge and
truth. We can never be certain that we have not just raised our
level of illusion. A simple remaining doubt is necessary. As
Cromwell said to Parliament "Be think ye Gentlemen you maybe
wrong." We remain arrogant and foolish.
The second principle is the refusal to engage in a "fee for
practice" service arrangement. Sufis can not take fees. The
conflict of interest is clear. If you are making your
"living" by consulting or guiding - then you confuse your
interests and the interest of the "client". You are the
post in the story of the drunk holding on to the lamp post - the
consultant is there more for support than illumination. Sufi
instruction is not always easy or pleasant. You may
have to confront barriers.
Sufi methods depend on spontaneous and free response to
intuitions they have about other people. They tend to tell other
about what they are. These "hunches" maybe the result of neurosis
or imagination. Even if correct, most people do not want to know
more about their limitations, most prefer adulation and
avoidance. If you are concerned about social conventions, fees,
and how it will "come across", then you are a salesman, a
performer, not a teacher. You are not going to kick people off
their "life-rafts", or take away the physical and emotional ties
they have to protect themselves in what is perceived as rough
water. You are trying to help them ashore - and then point out
they don't need to care the weight of their rafts with them. Real
education requires real change - wake up - open your eyes - you
have been living in a dream - pay attention -
Short History of Sufi:
I think the origin was as shaman of the Caucasian tribes. In UR
and the first civilizations they then became priest and kings.
Meditative orders of monks grew up in the Hindu Kirsh which are
responsible for the order of the universes. (Like the Hopi) In
the first few thousand of years travelers in wool trades became
wandering teachers. Students were passed from one to the other
using signs, codes, and the numerical systems of language
(Letters being numbers - transformed into patters which gave an
internal or secret writing also pictures and patterns ). The
example of John the Baptist is a model of the Sufi man from the
wilderness, teacher and spiritual guide.
The contact between Persia, the Greeks, and Hindu cultures
produced a more complex and formal neo-Platonist, Hermes, and
other schools that influences the Manichean Gospels of Leucius,
St. Augustine, and mystic Christian. Sheikh Daud Yusuf, Jesus of
the House of David, a Prophet, a teacher, a Messenger of the rank
of Insan Kamil or Complete Man. (The Acts of John) The church may
have for bureaucratic reasons misunderstood the idea of "Son of
God." In some way Jesus has become less of a door and more of a
pit or barrier in formal churches. The idea that following blind
ritual and having an blind non-rational faith will cause salvation
is very un-Sufi. Wisdom is sought to fulfill the incompleteness
of our souls and for its own glory or merit - Slaves and peasants
may need prizes and promises that can not be met. As the Grand
inquisitor says they need a guiding hand and to have hope in the
impossible pie in the sky when they die.
The name Sufi appears with Mohammed and the organized schools
were very close to the family of the Prophet's grandchildren from
Fatima and Husin. The interactions of Moslem and Sufi culture
makes one believe that one is the reflection of the other. A law
and way for the masses, and another way for the "brotherhood."
All religions have to deal with the lazy and ignorant. No one has
found a way to make purses from pigs ears. I am working hard on
the way to do this. Democracy and current conditions require new
experimental methods. The old ways are too occult, complex,
mysterious and elitist.
Formal schools involved Thursday night meeting where circles of
annotated world work on mystic rights under the leadership of a
guide. Rumi founded the Dervishes. The Builders (al-Banna) became
the Freemasons, and the "secret knowledge" was much sought in
Europe from the time of the crusades on. The Philosophers stone
and alchemy that Newton spend most of his life trying to
understand may have been an allegory for psychological rather
that physical experiments.
A short list of influences:
Christians associated with St. Augustine and St. John of the
Cross (Rosticrusian), St. Teresa of Avila,
St. John the Baptist - the wool and Sheikh Daud Yusuf, Ben Joseph
el Nazarene Jesus as a
Sufi Teacher. (Hallaj)
The Romance Literature and Troubadours, William Tell, Coffee,
clothes (shirt, belt, trousers) Andalusian, dance
waltz, morris dance, Dante, Robinson Crusoe, Chaucer,
William Tell, Freemasons, Tarot Cards,
Arabist School of Montpellier (Jews from Spain)
Medicine - Ibn El-Arabi
The Seven Pillars of Wisdom (Lawrence of Arabia)
Abu Bakr, Umar, Ali, Bilal, Ibn Riyah, Abu Abdullah, Salman the
Persian (Zoroastrians)
Burton's 1001 Nights, Omar Khayyan -
Jalaludin Rumi (and the Dervish)
The Rose, Rosicrucians, Rosary from the Spanish illuminist
(illuminati)
Sufi claim a decent from: (Saracens the Reciter)
Hermes of Egypt, Mary the Hebrew, Democritus of Greece,
Morienus of Rome, Avicenna (Ibn Sina) of Arabia, Albertus
Magnus of Germany, Arnold of Villaneuve of France, Thomas
Aquinas of Italy, Raymond Lully of Spain, Roger Bacon of
England, Melchoir Cibienis of Hungary, Anonymous Sarmata
(Michael Sendivogius ) of Poland.
Roger Bacon, Geber, (Western Alchemy), Raymond Lully the
Majorcan, Shakespeare, Chaucer, Dante, Milton - Hans Christian
Anderson, Kipling,
Jungian archetypal from Ibn El-Arabi (Modern Man in Search of a
Soul" C.C. Jung)
Robert Graves "The Crowning Privilege"
The Bhakti of Hindus, Zen , Yoga, Knights Templar, The Order of
the Garter, Freemasons.
************************************************************
Peter E. Pflaum Ph.D. * THE_SUFI_METHODS
ppppflaump@cfl.rr.com
************************************************************
What shall be done?
Regional Government
Imposed peace on Israel and Palestine
Supports to Capital markets
Delegate to the 10 federal regional
councils administrative and budget authority with regional commissioners
acting for the OMB and Whitehouse. Decentralize the federal government
by moving staff and power to the regional capitols. The first step in creating
10 smaller nations, within a political and economic union, which do not
feel they have to police or rule the world.
An EU, NATO, Arabian intervention
giving administrative control over the West Bank to Jordan and Gaza to
Egypt after the removal of the Jewish settlements. A kind of Balkans peacekeeping
arrangement imposed on those who cannot solve their own problems.
We need to work on the removal of
sanctions on Iraq, Iran and Libya and a closer American Arab relationship
looking toward a common interest in stability and anti-terrorist activity.
Creating stability – rainy day fund
– of 100’s of billions from the surplus to a board of economic stabilization
that is responsible for capital markets and has the resources to support
markets in times of crisis.
One percent of a 10 trillion dollar economy is 100 billion – the forecasts range from up 3 % next year (OMB) to down 3 % (CSFB)- 300 billion up or down. The federal government gets 20 % so will gain or lose 60 billion of a 150 billion surplus. If there is a 3 % decline and costs go up 20 billion for recovery and war – the surplus is almost gone.
Pearl Harbor (Dec. 6, 1941): 2,388
D-Day (June 6, 1944): 4,900
Iwo Jima (Feb. 19-March 25, 1945): 6,503
|